Hong Kong Med J 2015 Feb;21(1):45–51 | Epub 1 Aug 2014
DOI: 10.12809/hkmj134147
Use of viscoelastic haemostatic assay in emergency and elective surgery
Maximus CF Yeung, MB, BS; Steven YT Tong, MB, BS; Paul YW Tong, MB, BS; Billy HH Cheung, MB, BS; Joanne YW Ng, MB, BS; Gilberto KK Leung, MB, BS, FHKAM (Surgery)
Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
Corresponding author: Dr Gilberto KK Leung (gilberto@hku.hk)
 Full paper in PDF
Objectives: To review the current evidence for the use of viscoelastic haemostatic assays in different surgical settings including trauma, cardiac surgery, liver transplantation, as well as the monitoring of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants prior to surgery.
Data sources: PubMed database.
Study selection: Key words for the literature search were “thromboelastography” or “ROTEM” in combination with “trauma”, “antiplatelet”, “cardiac surgery”, “liver transplantation” or “anticoagulants”.
Data extraction: Original and major review articles related to the use of viscoelastic haemostatic assays.
Data synthesis: Haemostatic function is a critical factor determining patient outcomes in emergency or elective surgery. The increasing use of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants has potentially increased the risks of haemorrhages and the need for transfusion. Conventional coagulation tests have limitations in detecting haemostatic dysfunctions in subgroups of patients and are largely ineffective in diagnosing hyperfibrinolysis. The viscoelastic haemostatic assays are potentially useful point-of-care tools that provide information on clot formation, clot strength, and fibrinolysis, as well as to guide goal-directed transfusion and antifibrinolytic therapy. They may also be used to monitor antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. However, standardisation of techniques and reference ranges is required before these tests can be widely used in different clinical settings.
Conclusions: Viscoelastic haemostatic assays, as compared with conventional coagulation tests, are better for detecting coagulopathy and are the only tests that can provide rapid diagnosis of hyperfibrinolysis. Goal-directed administration of blood products based on the results of viscoelastic haemostatic assays was associated with reduction in allogeneic blood product transfusions in trauma, cardiac surgery, and liver transplantation cases. However, there is currently no evidence to support the routine use of viscoelastic haemostatic assays for monitoring platelet function prior to surgery.
Conventional coagulation tests (CCTs) including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen level, and D-dimer have long been the standard laboratory indicators of patients’ coagulation status. With the introduction of the cell-based model of haemostasis,1 the role of platelets for intact thrombin generation, and the limitations of CCTs have become increasingly recognised. First of all, CCTs only measure individual clotting components but do not take into account the important interactions between platelets, clotting factors, and other cellular components in the generation of thrombin, nor the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis. Consequently, results from CCTs may not correlate with clinically significant coagulopathies or guide transfusion. Secondly, the quantity of individual elements does not necessarily indicate how well haemostasis is functioning, and qualitative dysfunction of platelets and clotting factors is not taken into account. In addition, PT/aPTT do not assess the overall strength and stability of clots as they are read at the initiation of fibrin polymerisation, which occurs when only <5% of total thrombin has been generated. Last but not least, CCTs are not point-of-care assays and the long processing time may lead to treatment delay with associated morbidity and mortality.2
In recent years, there has been an increasing use of viscoelastic haemostatic assays (VHAs), mainly thrombelastography (TEG; Hemoscope Corporation, Niles [IL], US) and the rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM; Tem International GmbH, Munich, Germany), to provide global and functional assessment of coagulation. Both tests can be performed at the point-of-care during both emergency and elective surgery, and may be used to target transfusion at specific abnormalities with a positive impact on minimising unnecessary transfusion of allogeneic blood products.3 4 5
In the following sections, we shall describe the basic principles of VHAs, followed by a literature review of current evidence for its use. We searched the PubMed database for all original and major review articles published in the English language, using the keywords “thromboelastography” or “ROTEM” in combination with “trauma”, “antiplatelet”, “cardiac surgery”, “liver transplantation” or “anticoagulants”. Abstracts were screened for eligibility, and the reference lists of eligible articles were searched for further related studies. The date of the last search was 31 May 2013. All original studies and major review articles concerning the use of TEG and/or ROTEM in trauma, cardiac surgery, liver transplantation, and monitoring of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants were included.
Principles of viscoelastic haemostatic assays
Thrombelastography was first described in 1948 by Hartert6 as a method to assess the viscoelastic properties of coagulation in whole blood under low shear conditions. The VHAs give a graphic presentation of clot formation and subsequent lysis.3 They measure the viscoelastic properties of a clot as it forms in a cup after the addition of activators. As the cup or pin oscillates, the torque of the rotational cup, which is directly related to the strength of the formed clot, is transmitted via the pin to a mechanoelectrical transducer (Fig 1). The signals are then analysed by a computer that produces a trace graph. The latter is divided into several parts with each reflecting different stages of the haemostatic process (Fig 2). Although the nomenclatures differ between TEG and ROTEM, both provide information on the speed of coagulation initiation (coagulation factor activation), kinetics of clot growth (thrombin generation and cleavage of fibrinogen), clot strength, and fibrinolysis (Table). Different tracing morphology and parameters will indicate which component of the coagulation process may be dysfunctional.

Figure 1. The principles of viscoelastic tests

Figure 2. TEG and ROTEM tracing TEG parameters

Table. TEG and ROTEM parameters and their meanings
Theoretical advantages of viscoelastic haemostatic assays over conventional coagulation tests
Viscoelastic haemostatic assays assess the combined influence of circulating plasmatic and cellular (platelets, erythrocytes, leukocytes, microparticles) elements. Results are available within 10 minutes, which can be utilised at the point-of-care in different clinical settings. The end-points are clinically relevant, allowing goal-directed coagulation factor transfusions,7 8 9 with a reduction in allogeneic blood product usage in trauma, cardiac, and liver surgery cases.10 11 12 For example, fibrinogen concentrates could be given in situations with decreased maximum amplitude (MA)/maximum clot firmness (MCF). Last but not least, as fibrinolysis plays an important role in both trauma-associated coagulopathy as well as bleeding in patients undergoing elective cardiac and liver surgery, VHAs serve as the only tests available for rapid identification and quantification of hyperfibrinolysis in those situations.
Moreover, VHAs can be used in diagnosing surgical bleeding when the results of CCTs are normal, and also play an important role in the assessment of hypercoagulable states, prediction of bleeding risks in patients with liver and renal failures, and as a research tool to improve the understanding of the impact of various interventions on coagulation.
Trauma surgery
Uncontrolled haemorrhage accounts for more than 50% of all trauma-related deaths within the first 48 hours after hospitalisation.13 14 15 16 Current evidence suggests that haemodilution, hypothermia, acidaemia, and the consumption of clotting factors all play roles in the pathogenesis of coagulopathy in trauma.17 Hyperfibrinolysis is associated with more severe injury, greater coagulation abnormalities, and a higher mortality rate. Kashuk et al18 suggested that primary fibrinolysis occurred early in severely injured patients, leading to rapid clot dissolution.
Massive transfusion of blood products in trauma is not without risks, and may be associated with increased risks of acute respiratory distress syndrome, multi-organ failure, volume overload, and transfusion-related infections. In particular, the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury following fresh frozen plasma transfusion is recognised as the most important cause of transfusion-associated mortality and morbidity.19 Currently, the decision of what, when, and how much blood products to transfuse in massive trauma-related bleeding is mainly empirical, though often supplemented by results from CCTs. The laboratory diagnosis of fibrinolysis, unfortunately, is often a difficult one, requiring multiple tests such as euglobulin lysis time (ELT), platelet count, fibrinogen, protein S, protein C, and antithrombin levels, all of which may not be readily available in the acute phase of trauma management. Moreover, D-dimer (a marker of fibrinolysis) is elevated in virtually all trauma patients and is, therefore, not a useful indicator.
The VHAs, on the other hand, may provide distinct advantages by promptly diagnosing trauma coagulopathy (especially hyperfibrinolysis), guiding blood transfusions, and providing potential prognostic indicators. In a systematic review of 12 reported studies, Sankarankutty et al20 found that TEG/ROTEM could be used to diagnose hyperfibrinolysis accurately. There were otherwise inconsistent correlations between VHAs and CCTs; the most consistent correlation identified was between TEG MA and ROTEM MCF with platelet count and aPTT. Davenport et al21 showed that ELT, which was used as a gold standard test for the detection of fibrinolysis, was correlated with clot amplitude at 10 minutes and 15 minutes, MCF, and clot lysis index at 60 minutes. This has important implications in the use of antifibrinolytic agents and fibrinogen for targeted management.22 As demonstrated in the CRASH-2 study, trauma patients who received an antifibrinolytic agent within 3 hours of trauma experienced a significant reduction in mortality.23
Other studies also provided evidence to support VHA-guided transfusion practice. Schöchl et al24 25 reported that ROTEM-guided haemostatic therapy with coagulation factor concentrates (eg fibrinogen concentrate, prothrombin complex concentrate) could facilitate early and effective correction of coagulopathy, as well as reduce transfusion of allogeneic blood products. Kashuk et al26 27 showed that goal-directed resuscitation based on rapid-TEG (rTEG) could reduce the use of fresh frozen plasma. In terms of prognostication, TEG MA and ROTEM MCF have been found to be associated with mortality, while excessive fibrinolysis diagnosed by either TEG clot lysis (CL) or ROTEM maximum lysis (ML) was an independent predictor of mortality.
Cardiac surgery
Heparin is used during cardiopulmonary bypass in open-heart surgery, and excessive postoperative bleeding has been attributed to the insufficient reversal of heparinisation with protamine sulfate. This is partly due to the fact that conventional monitoring by means of activated clotting time may fail to differentiate between the contributions from heparinisation, dilution, and platelet dysfunction.28 29 Johansson et al30 reviewed over 3250 cardiac patients reported in 16 studies, and demonstrated superiority of VHAs over CCTs in predicting bleeding and the need for re-operation. The total number of blood transfusions was reduced with VHA-guided transfusion compared with CCT-based practices. The degree of heparinisation could be evaluated with assays that neutralise the heparin (heparinase in TEG and HepTEM [heparinase-modified thromboelastometry] in ROTEM), so that non-heparin–related haemostatic problems could be detected. These findings were corroborated in a recent Cochrane analysis.11
Liver transplantation
A temporary hypercoagulable state is common after liver transplantation due to imbalance between the procoagulant and anticoagulant systems, as well as fibrinolytic shutdown.31 This may play a role in the early development of hepatic artery thrombosis.32 The use of CCT monitoring alone in the first week post-transplantation may lead to significant bleeding complications in certain patients.33 34 In contrast, VHAs can accurately assess postoperative hypercoagulability and thrombosis. Cerutti et al35 showed that TEG monitoring could demonstrate hypercoagulability in the majority of the subjects after living donor liver transplantation and may, therefore, be used to guide antithrombotic treatment in the perioperative period.
Monitoring antiplatelet therapy
With the rising prevalence of atherosclerotic diseases such as ischaemic heart disease and stroke, it is not uncommon for surgical patients to be on antiplatelet drugs. The latter may worsen bleeding in trauma, increase transfusion requirement, and increase the need for re-operation after elective surgery.36 37 Unfortunately, CCTs do not test for platelet inhibition due to antiplatelet therapy, and tests for platelet function such as platelet aggregometry do not provide results rapidly enough for intra-operative monitoring and assessment of coagulopathy in emergency surgery. Furthermore, although antiplatelet drugs are thought to work primarily by decreasing platelet aggregation, they may also have anticoagulant effects.36 In this respect, the MA/MCF from TEG/ROTEM may serve to reveal the overall platelet function and fibrinogen levels. In differentiating whether reduced clot strength is due to low fibrinogen or low platelet concentration/functionality, both TEG and ROTEM have specific assays (functional fibrinogen and FIBTEM [fibrin-based clotting], respectively) that block platelet contributions with the addition of platelet inhibitors. At present, however, there is no clinical evidence to support the routine use of VHAs for monitoring platelet function prior to surgery. Further studies are required to demonstrate the clinical benefits of these tests in reducing transfusion requirement and improving surgical outcomes.
Monitoring anticoagulation therapy
Anticoagulation therapy has similar negative impact on emergency and elective surgery as antiplatelet therapy. Point-of-care VHAs have been shown to be useful in monitoring treatments with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), heparinoids (eg danaparoid), and unfractionated heparin.38 However, to increase the sensitivity of VHAs for the effects of LMWH and heparinoids, both standard and heparinase-modified tests have to be carried out. Recently, direct thrombin inhibitors such as dabigatran are being used increasingly for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembosis, acute coronary syndrome, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.39 The monitoring of this group of patients is facilitated by VHAs with the use of ecarin clotting time, in which ecarin is used to activate thrombin directly.40 41
Limitations of viscoelastic haemostatic assays
There is at present a lack of universally agreed algorithms for the use of VHAs. In a recent systematic review of nine randomised clinical trials (eight in cardiac surgery and one in liver transplantation) comparing VHA-based algorithms with standard treatments, the only supporting evidence identified for the use of VHAs was for detection of hyperfibrinolysis.2
On an operational level, VHAs have been criticised for not having undergone the same evaluation process as CCTs. There are wide technical variations in how VHAs are performed, and the machine requires calibrations 2 to 3 times a day which causes significant inconvenience in daily point-of-care usage.42 While originally designed for fresh whole blood with no additional activators, subsequent modifications have included sample anticoagulation and the use of different activators to standardise the initiation of coagulation. Patients’ gender, age, and alcohol drinking may also affect the result. Moreover, the normal reference ranges for VHAs were derived from hospitalised surgical patients in one study, and from a small sample of 12 healthy volunteers in another.43 Hence, each centre is recommended to generate its own reference range by specially trained personnel according to the guidelines from the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments.44 The latter, which regulates all laboratory tests in the United States, demands a minimum of 30 to 40 subjects for special coagulation tests.45 All these necessitate an active and tightly controlled quality assurance programme.42
Despite its proposed role as a point-of-care test, a complete viscoelastic test can take up to 60 minutes although useful information can be obtained in approximately 10 minutes, when MCF is reached. This may be further increased by a 30- to 40-minute wait for anticoagulated samples.42 To compensate for this, a modified rTEG has been developed. It uses tissue factors as activators in addition to kaolin, and can provide results on MCF more rapidly. However, information on coagulation and clot formation time is limited. Although there is a strong correlation between rTEG and conventional TEG in terms of overall clot strength and platelet function, there is only moderate correlation in the degree of fibrin cross-linking and poor correlation in evaluating thrombolysis.46
There are conditions in which VHAs may fail to detect haemostatic dysfunction. The test setting is at 37°C. Therefore, the effect of hypothermia, which has a well-recognised negative impact on coagulation, may not be recognised.47 48 Viscoelastic haemostatic assays do not assess the endothelial contribution to haemostasis since an activator is directly added to initiate coagulation during the test. This means that the diagnosis of certain conditions such as von Willebrand disease is not possible with VHAs.48
Lastly, the interchangeability of results between TEG and ROTEM has been questioned. Although they share the same fundamental principles, and similar parameters, hardware and techniques, the results generated may not be directly comparable, possibly due to the use of different activators. Consistent correlations are limited to that between TEG MA and ROTEM MCF measurements, and that between TEG CL and ROTEM ML in diagnosing hyperfibrinolysis and predicting mortality.
Haemostatic function is a critical factor determining patient outcomes in emergency or elective surgery. The increasing use of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants has potentially increased the risks of haemorrhages and need for transfusion. Conventional coagulation tests have limitations in detecting haemostatic dysfunction in subgroups of patients and are largely ineffective in diagnosing hyperfibrinolysis. The VHAs are potentially useful point-of-care tools to provide information on clot formation, clot strength, and fibrinolysis, as well as to guide goal-directed transfusion and antifibrinolytic therapy. They may also be used to monitor antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. However, standardisation of techniques and reference ranges is required before these tests can be widely used in different clinical settings. Further studies are needed to validate different algorithms, and address coagulopathies in situations like hypothermia or endothelial dysfunction.
No conflicts of interest were declared by the authors.
1. Roberts HR, Hoffman M, Monroe DM. A cell-based model of thrombin generation. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006;32 Suppl 1:32-8. CrossRef
2. Wikkelsoe AJ, Afshari A, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Moeller AM. Monitoring patients at risk of massive transfusion with thrombelastography or thromboelastometry: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011;55:1174-89. CrossRef
3. Ganter MT, Hofer CK. Coagulation monitoring: current techniques and clinical use of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation devices. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1366-75. CrossRef
4. Kaufmann CR, Dwyer KM, Crews JD, Dols SJ, Trask AL. Usefulness of thrombelastography in assessment of trauma patient coagulation. J Trauma 1997;42:716-20. CrossRef
5. Rugeri L, Levrat A, David JS, et al. Diagnosis of early coagulation abnormalities in trauma patients by rotation thrombelastography. J Thromb Haemost 2007;5:289-95. CrossRef
6. Hartert H. Blutgerinnungsstudien mit der thrombelastographie, einem neuen untersuchungsverfahren [in German]. Klin Wochenschr 1948;26:577-83. CrossRef
7. Bontempo FA, Lewis JH, Van Thiel DH, et al. The relation of preoperative coagulation findings to diagnosis, blood usage and survival in adult liver transplantation. Transplantation 1985;39:532-6. CrossRef
8. Steib A, Gengenwin N, Freys G, Boudjema K, Levy S, Otteni JC. Predictive factors of hyperfibrinolytic activity during liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients. Br J Anaesth 1994;73:645-8. CrossRef
9. Dzik WH, Arkin CF, Jenkins RL, Stump DC. Fibrinolysis during liver transplantation in humans: role of tissue-type plasminogen activator. Blood 1988;71:1090-5.
10. Afshari A, Wikkelsø A, Brok J, Møller AM, Wetterslev J. Thrombelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor haemotherapy versus usual care in patients with massive transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(3):CD007871.
11. Wang SC, Shieh JF, Chang KY, et al. Thromboelastography-guided transfusion decreases intraoperative blood transfusion during orthotopic liver transplantation: randomized clinical trial. Transplant Proc 2010;42:2590-3. CrossRef
12. Aoki K, Sugimoto A, Nagasawa A, Saito M, Ohzeki H. Optimization of thromboelastography-guided platelet transfusion in cardiovascular surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;60:411-6. CrossRef
13. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, et al. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma 1995;38:185-93. CrossRef
14. Brohi K, Cohen MJ, Davenport RA. Acute coagulopathy of trauma: mechanism, identification and effect. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007;13:680-5. CrossRef
15. Maegele M, Lefering R, Yucel N, et al. Early coagulopathy in multiply injury: an analysis from the German Trauma Registry on 8724 patients. Injury 2007;38:298-304. CrossRef
16. MacLeod JB, Lynn M, McKenney MG, Cohn SM, Murtha M. Early coagulopathy predicts mortality in trauma. J Trauma 2003;55:39-44. CrossRef
17. Hess JR, Brohi K, Dutton RP, et al. The coagulopathy of trauma: a review of mechanisms. J Trauma 2008;65:748-54. CrossRef
18. Kashuk JL, Moore EE, Sawyer M, et al. Primary fibrinolysis is integral in the pathogenesis of the acute coagulopathy of trauma. Ann Surg 2010;252:434-4.
19. Stainsby D, Jones H, Asher D, et al. Serious hazards of transfusion: a decade of hemovigilance in the UK. Transfus Med Rev 2006;20:273-82. CrossRef
20. Sankarankutty A, Nascimento B, Teodoro da Luz L, Rizoli S. TEG® and ROTEM® in trauma: similar test but different results. World J Emerg Surg 2012;7 Suppl 1:S3. CrossRef
21. Davenport R, Manson J, De’Ath H, et al. Functional definition and characterization of acute traumatic coagulopathy. Crit Care Med 2011;39:2652-8.
22. Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, et al. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(1):CD001886.
23. Roberts I, Shakur H, Coats T, et al. The CRASH-2 trial: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of the effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events and transfusion requirement in bleeding trauma patients. Health Technol Assess 2013;17:1-79.
24. Schöchl H, Nienaber U, Maegele M, et al. Transfusion in trauma: thromboelastometry-guided coagulation factor concentrate-based therapy versus standard fresh frozen plasma-based therapy. Crit Care 2011;15:R83. CrossRef
25. Schöchl H, Nienaber U, Hofer G, et al. Goal-directed coagulation management of major trauma patients using thromboelastometry (ROTEM®)-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate and prothrombin complex concentrate. Crit Care 2010;14:R55. CrossRef
26. Kashuk JL, Moore EE, Le T, et al. Noncitrated whole blood is optimal for evaluation of postinjury coagulopathy with point-of-care rapid thrombelastography. J Surg Res 2009;156:133-8. CrossRef
27. Kashuk JL, Moore EE, Wohlauer M, et al. Initial experiences with point-of-care rapid thrombelastography for management of life-threatening postinjury coagulopathy. Transfusion 2012;52:23-33. CrossRef
28. Koster A, Fischer T, Praus M, et al. Hemostatic activation and inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass: impact of heparin management. Anesthesiology 2002;97:837-41. CrossRef
29. Koster A, Despotis G, Gruendel M, et al. The plasma supplemented modified activated clotting time for monitoring of heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot investigation. Anesth Analg 2002;95:26-30. CrossRef
30. Johansson PI, Sølbeck S, Genet G, Stensballe J, Ostrowski SR. Coagulopathy and hemostatic monitoring in cardiac surgery: an update. Scand Cardiovasc J 2012;46:194-202. CrossRef
31. Stahl RL, Duncan A, Hooks MA, Henderson JM, Millikan WJ, Warren WD. A hypercoagulable state follows orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology 1990;12:553-8. CrossRef
32. Lisman T, Porte RJ. Hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: more than just a surgical complication? Transpl Int 2009;22:162-3. CrossRef
33. Francoz C, Belghiti J, Vilgrain V, et al. Splanchnic vein thrombosis in candidates for liver transplantation: usefulness of screening and anticoagulation. Gut 2005;54:691-7. CrossRef
34. Widen A, Rolando N, Manousou P, et al. Anticoagulation after liver transplantation: a retrospective audit and case-control study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2009;20:615-8. CrossRef
35. Cerutti E, Stratta C, Romagnoli R, et al. Thromboelastogram monitoring in the perioperative period of hepatectomy for adult living liver donation. Liver Transpl 2004;10:289-94. CrossRef
36. Jacob M, Smedira N, Blackstone E, Williams S, Cho L. Effect of timing of chronic preoperative aspirin discontinuation on morbidity and mortality in patients having combined coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery. Am J Cardiol 2012;109:824-30. CrossRef
37. Jacob M, Smedira N, Blackstone E, Williams S, Cho L. Effect of timing of chronic preoperative aspirin discontinuation on morbidity and mortality in coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2011;123:577-83. CrossRef
38. Coppell JA, Thalheimer U, Zambruni A, et al. The effects of unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin and danaparoid on the thromboelastogram (TEG): an in-vitro comparison of standard and heparinase-modified TEGs with conventional coagulation assays. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2006;17:97-104. CrossRef
39. Di Nisio M, Middeldorp S. Büller HR. Direct thrombin inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1028-40. CrossRef
40. Nielsen VG, Steenwyk BL, Gurley WQ, Pereira SJ, Lell WA, Kirklin JK. Argatroban, bivalirudin, and lepirudin do not decrease clot propagation and strength as effectively as heparin-activated antithrombin in vitro. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006;25:653-63. CrossRef
41. Carroll RC, Chavez JJ, Simmons JW, et al. Measurement of patients’ bivalirudin plasma levels by a thrombelastograph ecarin clotting time assay: a comparison to a standard activated clotting time. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1316-9. CrossRef
42. da Luz LT, Nascimento B, Rizoli S. Thrombelastography (TEG): practical considerations on its clinical use in trauma resuscitation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013;21:29. CrossRef
43. Scarpelini S, Rhind SG, Nascimento B, et al. Normal range values for thromboelastography in healthy adult volunteers. Braz J Med Biol Res 2009;42:1210-7. CrossRef
44. Chan KL, Summerhayes RG, Ignjatovic V, Horton SB, Monagle PT. Reference values for kaolin-activated thromboelastography in healthy children. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1610-3. CrossRef
45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Considering the clinical laboratory improvement amendment. CDC website: http://wwwn.cdc.gov/cliac/pdf/Addenda/cliac0210/Addendum%20Y.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2010.
46. Lee TH, McCully BH, Underwood SJ, Cotton BA, Cohen MJ, Schreiber MA. Correlation of conventional thrombelastography and rapid thrombelastography in trauma. Am J Surg 2013;205:521-7. CrossRef
47. Rundgren M, Engström M. A thromboelastometric evaluation of the effects of hypothermia on the coagulation system. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1465-8. CrossRef
48. Johansson PI, Stissing T, Bochsen L, Ostrowski SR. Thrombelastography and thromboelastometry in assessing coagulopathy in trauma. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009;17:45. CrossRef