Hong Kong Med J 2014;20:255–7 | Number 3, June 2014
DOI: 10.12809/hkmj133971
CASE REPORT
Acute appendicitis complicating Amyand’s hernia: imaging features and literature review
WK Tsang, FRCR, FHKAM (Radiology)1; KL Lee, FRCR, FHKAM (Radiology)2; KF Tam, FRCR, FHKAM (Radiology)3; SF Lee, FRCR, FHKAM (Radiology)3
1 Department of Radiology and Imaging, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
2 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
3 Department of Radiology, North District Hospital, Sheung Shui, Hong Kong
 
Corresponding author: Dr WK Tsang (tsang_k@yahoo.com.hk)
Abstract
Acute appendicitis complicating Amyand’s hernia is an extremely rare condition, in which the appendix herniates into the inguinal sac and, subsequently, gets inflamed. The condition is difficult to diagnose clinically. Imaging is valuable for its diagnosis and detection of the associated complications. In this article, we will discuss the imaging features of acute appendicitis complicating Amyand’s hernia and the results of a literature review on the condition.
 
 
Introduction
Amyand’s hernia is a rare condition in which the appendix herniates into the inguinal sac. It is most commonly detected incidentally during hernia repair. Acute appendicitis in Amyand’s hernia occurs even less frequently, and is difficult to diagnose clinically. Imaging is valuable for its diagnosis and detection of the associated complications. Here we report our experience with this disease entity, its imaging features, and the results of a literature review.
 
Case report
An 82-year-old man with unremarkable history presented to the surgeons with fever and generalised abdominal pain. On physical examination, he had a temperature of 38.8°C, diffuse abdominal tenderness, and a tender, irreducible right inguinal lump. Laboratory tests revealed mildly elevated white cell count. His supine abdominal radiography was unremarkable. A provisional diagnosis of irreducible right inguinal hernia was made. However, it was atypical that the patient did not have symptoms or signs suggestive of intestinal obstruction. Urgent ultrasonography (USG) of the right groin showed a blind-ending fluid-filled tubular structure within the right scrotal sac. This structure extended superiorly along the inguinal canal, entered the right lower abdomen and joined the caecum (Fig 1a). It was compatible with the appendix. Acute inflammation was indicated by wall hypervascularity and tenderness elicited upon compression. There was no adjacent free fluid or collection to suggest abscess formation or a ruptured appendix. The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography (CT) as dilated appendix with wall hyperenhancement and herniation into the right scrotal sac (Fig 1b). Periappendiceal strandings, reactive regional lymph nodes, and oedematous right scrotal wall were noted. Emergency appendectomy and right inguinal herniorrhaphy were performed. A pus-filled appendix was revealed within the right scrotal sac during the procedure (Fig 2).
 

Figure 1. (a) Ultrasonography of the right scrotal sac shows a tender noncompressible blind-ending fluid-filled tubular structure (arrowheads). It extends superiorly and connects with the caecum. Features are suggestive of acute appendicitis complicating Amyand’s hernia. The right scrotal wall is thickened and oedematous (arrows) due to secondary inflammation. (b) Coronal multiplanar reformation from multidetector computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis confirms the diagnosis. A dilated appendix (arrowheads) originates from the caecum (asterisk) herniates into the right scrotal sac via the right inguinal ring (empty arrows). Wall hyperenhancement and adjacent strandings are present. Thickened oedematous right scrotal wall from secondary inflammation is again noted (solid arrows)
 

Figure 2. Emergency appendectomy and right inguinal herniorrhaphy reveal a pus-filled appendix (arrowheads) within the right scrotal sac
 
Discussion
Amyand’s hernia is named after Claudius Amyand (1660-1735), a sergeant-surgeon to King George II of England. In 1735, he performed the first documented successful appendectomy on an 11-year-old boy who had a perforated, acutely inflamed appendix within the right scrotal sac.1 The appendix was perforated by a previously swallowed pin, leading to formation of an enterocutaneous fistula.
 
Amyand’s hernia is uncommon, with a prevalence of 1% among all the repaired inguinal hernias.2 Most often, it is found incidentally during surgery.2 It is more frequent in males. The condition may present in individuals from any age, through premature neonates to the elderly people.3 4 The majority of cases occur on the right side, the side where appendix normally locates and inguinal hernia more commonly happens. Less than 10 cases of left-sided Amyand’s hernia have been reported in the literature; these can occur in patients with situs inversus, intestinal malrotation, or a mobile caecum.5 6 7 8 9
 
Appendicitis more frequently occurs in Amyand’s hernia than in appendix at normal position. The superficial location of the appendix within the inguinal sac can possibly make it more vulnerable to trauma and secondary inflammation. Another postulation is that the abdominal muscles can constrict the hernial orifice and induce intermittent compression of the appendix. This might induce ischaemia of the appendix and make it more susceptible to infection.10 Apart from appendicitis, the other documented complications of Amyand’s hernia include irreducibility and strangulation of the appendix, abscess formation, peritonitis, and enterocutaneous fistula formation.1 Other intra-abdominal structures such as the caecum, urinary bladder, and omentum can accompany the appendix and herniate into the hernial sac.6 7
 
The diagnosis of Amyand’s hernia is rarely made clinically. Most often it is mistaken as an irreducible inguinal hernia. Imaging is valuable for preoperative diagnosis and detection of any complications. Coronal multiplanar reformations from multidetector CT of the abdomen and pelvis are excellent imaging modalities for demonstrating a blind-ending tubular structure arising from the caecum which extends into the inguinal sac. Luminal dilatation, wall thickening and hyperenhancement, adjacent stranding and fluid are suggestive of acute appendicitis. Complications such as perforation and abscess formation should be sought. In children and pregnant women, USG and magnetic resonance imaging are preferred with the advantage of being radiation free. In USG, the acutely inflamed appendix appears dilated, non-compressible with thickened hypervascular wall, and is tender upon compression.11 12 Sometimes the connection between the appendix and caecum might not be readily demonstrable, especially in overweight and pregnant patients.
 
The differentiation between usual inguinal hernias and Amyand’s hernia can be readily made by imaging. In usual inguinal hernia, a segment of small or large bowel is seen within the hernial sac. Littre’s hernia, which is defined as herniation of Meckel’s diverticulum, can mimic Amyand’s hernia both clinically and radiologically. It occurs in 11% of patients with Meckel’s diverticulum. Similar to Amyand’s hernia, Littre’s hernia is more prevalent in males and on the right side.13 About 50% of the cases occur in the inguinal region, with 20% occurring in the femoral canal, and 20% in the umbilicus.14 Just like Amyand’s hernia, a blind-ending tubular structure can be found in Littre’s hernia. Instead of arising from the caecum, it originates from the antimesenteric border of the distal small bowel.15 In addition, a normal appendix should be detected in patients with Littre’s hernia unless it has been resected.
 
Conclusion
Acute appendicitis complicating Amyand’s hernia is extremely rare and is difficult to diagnose clinically. Imaging is valuable for its diagnosis and detection of associated complications.
 
References
1. Amyand C. Of an inguinal rupture, with a pin in the appendix caeci, incrusted with stone; and some observations on wounds in the guts. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 1736;39:329-36. CrossRef
2. Psarras K, Lalountas M, Baltatzis M, et al. Amyand's hernia—a vermiform appendix presenting in an inguinal hernia: a case series. J Med Case Rep 2011;5:463. CrossRef
3. Livaditi E, Mavridis G, Christopoulos-Geroulanos G. Amyand's hernia in premature neonates: report of two cases. Hernia 2007;11:547-9. CrossRef
4. Yang W, Tao Z, Chen H, et al. Amyand's hernia in elderly patients: diagnostic, anesthetic, and perioperative considerations. J Invest Surg 2009;22:426-9. CrossRef
5. Bakhshi GD, Bhandarwar AH, Govila AA. Acute appendicitis in left scrotum. Indian J Gastroenterol 2004;23:195.
6. Ghafouri A, Anbara T, Foroutankia R. A rare case report of appendix and cecum in the sac of left inguinal hernia (left Amyand's hernia). Med J Islam Repub Iran 2012;26:94-5.
7. Ravishankaran P, Mohan G, Srinivasan A, Ravindran G, Ramalingam A. Left sided Amyand's hernia, a rare occurrence: a case report. Indian J Surg 2013;75:247-8. CrossRef
8. Khan RA, Wahab S, Ghani I. Left-sided strangulated Amyand's hernia presenting as testicular torsion in an infant. Hernia 2011;15:83-4. CrossRef
9. Singh K, Singh RR, Kaur S. Amyand's hernia. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2011;16:171-2. CrossRef
10. Abu-Dalu J, Urca I. Incarcerated inguinal hernia with a perforated appendix and periappendicular abscess: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1972;15:464-5. CrossRef
11. Akfirat M, Kazez A, Serhatlioğlu S. Preoperative sonographic diagnosis of sliding appendiceal inguinal hernia. J Clin Ultrasound 1999;27:156-8. CrossRef
12. Celik A, Ergün O, Ozbek SS, Dökümcü Z, Balik E. Sliding appendiceal inguinal hernia: preoperative sonographic diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 2003;31:156-8. CrossRef
13. Shahid N, Ibrahim K. Littre's hernia. Professional Med J 2005;12:479-81.
14. Fa-Si-Oen PR, Roumen RM, Croiset van Uchelen FA. Complications and management of Meckel’s diverticulum: a review. Eur J Surg 1999;165:674-8. CrossRef
15. Sinha R. Bowel obstruction due to Littre hernia: CT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:682-4. CrossRef