Hong
        Kong Med J 2019 Jan;25(1):76–7; 76.e1-3
    
    © Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
    PICTORIAL MEDICINE
    Dynamic dual-source computed tomography imaging for
      myocardial perfusion
    Allen Li, MB, ChB, FHKAM (Radiology)1; YH
      Chan, MB, BS, FHKAM (Medicine)2; BE Wu, MB, BS, FHKAM
      (Medicine)3; CS Lam, MB, BS, FHKAM (Medicine)2
    1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear
      Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong
    2 Department of Medicine and Geriatrics,
      Pok Oi Hospital, Yuen Long, Hong Kong
    3 Department of Medicine and
      Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
    Corresponding author: Dr Allen Li (liallen@yahoo.com)
     Full
      paper in PDF
 Full
      paper in PDF
    A 54-year-old man who was an ex-smoker was admitted
      to Pok Oi Hospital in August 2015 with acute chest pain that was
      subsequently confirmed to be a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.
      Echocardiogram revealed anterior wall hypokinesia. Computed tomography
      (CT) coronary angiography demonstrated chronic total occlusion of the
      right coronary artery and a 90% stenotic lesion in the proximal to mid
      left anterior descending artery that was deemed to be the culprit lesion.
      Percutaneous coronary intervention was subsequently performed with a
      drug-eluting stent deployed across the proximal to mid left anterior
      descending artery stenosis. Angiographic results were excellent.
    At clinical follow-up, the patient complained of
      persistent chest discomfort. Repeated echocardiogram was unremarkable
      showing normal left ventricular function without any regional wall motion
      abnormality. A CT stress myocardial perfusion and viability study was
      requested to guide subsequent management. The study protocol included
      quantitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion with pharmacological
      stress using a dynamic approach, followed by a delayed scan for the
      presence or absence of late myocardial enhancement.
    Adenosine stress myocardial perfusion study with
      colour-coded maps demonstrated perfusion defects in the apicoseptal
      segment, the mid-inferoseptal segment, and to a lesser extent the basal
      inferoseptal segment (Fig 1). For quantitative evaluation, the normal
      areas had a myocardial blood flow of approximately 128 mL/100 mL/min,
      whereas areas with ischaemia had a flow of around 40 mL/100 mL/min. No
      delayed enhancement of the corresponding segments was evident to suggest
      scarring due to prior myocardial infarction (Fig 2).
    
Figure 1. Colour-coded maps of myocardial blood flow derived from stress dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (radiation dose about 8.5 mSv) showed significant perfusion hypoenhancement that involved (a) the apicoseptal segment, (b) the mid-inferoseptal segment, and to a lesser extent (c) the inferior aspect of the mid-basal anteroseptal segment (blue areas as indicated by the black arrows). Of note is the presence of artefacts at the subepicardial region of the mid-basal inferior segments (white arrowheads) and basal anteroseptal segment near the insertion point (blue arrow). Hibernating myocardium with reduced myocardial blood flow in the anterior segments from basal to apical levels

Figure 2. (a) Dual-energy computed tomography delayed enhancement showing no suspicious areas of late enhancement (radiation dose about 0.88 mSv). (b) Computed tomography myocardial perfusion study at the corresponding level demonstrates perfusion hypoenhancement (as indicated by the blue areas) of the inferoseptal segments
Eventually the patient underwent a percutaneous
      coronary intervention to the chronic total occlusion of the right coronary
      artery in 2016 via a combined radial and femoral arterial approach with
      successful stent deployment across the occluded segment. Final angiography
      showed excellent results with mild residual stenosis in patent ductus
      arteriosus ostium (Fig 3). To date, the patient remains symptom-free
      with improvements in both his exercise tolerance and mood, and psychiatric
      reports revealing reduced dosage of antidepressants.
    
Figure 3. Coronary angiography demonstrating (a) chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery with retrograde septal collaterals supplied from the left coronary system and (b) successful percutaneous coronary intervention with minimal residual stenosis of the patent ductus arteriosus ostium
Discussion
    Various imaging modalities are available for stress
      myocardial perfusion assessment.1
      The present case demonstrates how a state-of-the-art dynamic and
      quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion using a dual-source CT
      scanner enables detection of ischaemia along with viability assessment in
      a rapid and non-invasive fashion within an acceptable radiation dose.2
    Conventional “static” CT myocardial imaging allows
      visual qualitative assessment of a single snapshot of myocardial iodine
      contrast attenuation that requires precise timing of the arrival of
      contrast to preserve diagnostic integrity. With a dual-source CT,
      quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in multiple cardiac phases
      with precise anatomic localisation of the ischaemic area becomes possible.
      To date, many studies have assessed the reliability of dual-source
      multiple-detector CT in the dynamic and quantitative evaluation of
      myocardial perfusion.2 3 4 5
    Stress CT myocardial perfusion is emerging as a
      potentially promising non-invasive technique to detect myocardial
      ischaemia both qualitatively and quantitatively. With new-generation
      multiple-detector CT scanners, a one-stop non-invasive comprehensive
      evaluation of the heart including the coronary artery, ventricular
      function, myocardial perfusion, and viability is possible. Stress CT
      myocardial perfusion provides incremental benefit to standard coronary CT
      angiography, particularly for intermediate coronary lesions.2
    Author contributions
    All authors had full access to the data,
      contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and
      take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
    Concept or design: All authors.
Acquisition of data: A Li, YH Chan.
Analysis of data: A Li, YH Chan.
Drafting of manuscript: A Li, YH Chan.
Critical revision for important intellectual content: All authors.
    Acquisition of data: A Li, YH Chan.
Analysis of data: A Li, YH Chan.
Drafting of manuscript: A Li, YH Chan.
Critical revision for important intellectual content: All authors.
Conflicts of interest
    All authors have disclosed no conflicts of
      interest.
    Funding/support
    This research received no specific grant from any
      funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
    References
    1. Ko SM, Hwang HK, Kim SM, Cho IH.
      Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with
      emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
      2015;31(Suppl 1):1-21. Crossref
    2. Rossi A, Dharampal A, Wragg A, et al.
      Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained
      by dynamic computed tomography: does it predict functionally significant
      coronary lesions? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:85-94. Crossref
    3. Kim SM, Choi JH, Chang SA, Choe YH.
      Additional value of adenosine-stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion
      imaging in the reclassification of severity of coronary artery stenosis at
      coronary CT angiography. Clin Radiol 2013;68:659-68. Crossref
    4. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al.
      Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis:
      incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion
      imaging. Radiology 2011;260:689-98. Crossref
    5. Varga-Szemes A, Meinel FG, De Cecco CN,
      Fuller SR, Bayer RR 2nd, Schoepf UJ. CT myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR
      Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:487-97. Crossref

