Hong Kong Med J 2026;32:Epub 10 Apr 2026
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
CASE REPORT
Treatment with epidermal growth factor
receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a patient
on peritoneal dialysis with non–small cell lung
cancer: a case report
Sharon CL Ho, MB, BS; TY Kam, MB, ChB, FHKAM (Radiology)
Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
Corresponding author: Dr Sharon CL Ho (hcl715@ha.org.hk)
Case presentation
A 61-year-old female with lupus nephritis on
peritoneal dialysis presented to our institution in May
2018 with an incidental finding of a right lung nodule
on chest X-ray. Subsequent computed tomography
of the thorax and positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) showed a right
lower lobe nodule and two right pleural nodules.
Wedge resection of the three lesions confirmed
epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19
deletion–positive metastatic adenocarcinoma of
the lung with pleural metastases. She had baseline
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance
status score of 1 and had been on continuous
ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for 10 months prior
to the cancer diagnosis due to end-stage renal failure
secondary to lupus nephritis, with baseline estimated
glomerular filtration rate below 5 mL/min/1.73 m2
and normal albumin level. Concomitant medications
included hydroxychloroquine and prednisolone for
lupus.
The patient started on erlotinib 150 mg daily
in December 2018 with close monitoring of renal
function. Disease control was sustained with best
response of stable disease confirmed by serial
PET-CT scans performed approximately every 6
months. Erlotinib was well tolerated except for a
CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse
Events) grade 1 skin reaction manifesting as skin
dryness and pruritic maculopapular rash, managed
with topical emollients. Nonetheless, after 15
months of treatment, her skin reaction progressed to
grade 2, with development of paronychia, blepharitis
and increased pruritus. Erlotinib was suspended for
3 weeks. She also experienced grade 2 mucositis with
recurrent epistaxis, treated with topical emollients,
topical steroids and nasal ointment. Erlotinib
was resumed at 100 mg daily after resolution of
toxicities and was subsequently well tolerated. Renal
function remained stable on continuous ambulatory
peritoneal dialysis throughout erlotinib treatment.
In May 2020, following 18 months of erlotinib
treatment, PET-CT of the patient revealed disease progression in the pleura, liver, and lymph nodes
as well as bone metastases. She was switched to
osimertinib 80 mg daily in June 2020 after plasma
EGFR mutational analysis revealed a T790M
mutation. Treatment was well tolerated with
only a grade 1 skin reaction controlled by oral
doxycycline and topical emollients. There was an
initial biochemical response with carcinoembryonic
antigen level decreasing from 246 ng/mL to a nadir
of 83.1 ng/mL after 3 months of treatment, but
only a mixed response on PET-CT, evidenced by
responding lymph node metastases and existing
liver metastases, alongside the development of
new liver metastases and new collapse of the
T4 vertebra with narrowing of the spinal canal.
Magnetic resonance imaging showed severe spinal
stenosis with radiological cord compression at T4.
The orthopaedic team was consulted but the patient
declined surgical intervention and was managed
conservatively with thoracolumbar orthoses. She
had previously received palliative radiotherapy to the
same site for pain control. Clinically, she had no limb
weakness, sensory changes or sphincter disturbance.
With limited options for next-line treatment due
to end-stage renal failure, she opted to continue
osimertinib.
After a further 9 months of osimertinib
treatment, the patient was hospitalised in March
2021 with epigastric pain and newly deranged
liver function. She had previously tested negative
for hepatitis B surface antigen, with positive
anti–hepatitis B antigen, positive anti-hepatitis B
antibody, and undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA.
The PET-CT confirmed further disease progression
with extensive liver metastases, described in the
report as almost entirely involving the liver with
new hepatomegaly of up to 17 cm. Osimertinib was
stopped and the patient succumbed 1 week later to
liver failure secondary to liver metastases.
Discussion
Lung cancer is the most common cancer and
the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Hong Kong.1 Genetic profiling has revolutionised
treatment. In Hong Kong, EGFR mutation represents
the most common driver mutation, occurring in up
to 50% of lung adenocarcinomas among Asians.2
Treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
(TKIs) has demonstrated excellent efficacy and
tolerability, extending median survival in patients
with metastatic disease to more than 3 years.3 In
general, systemic treatment for cancer patients with
end-stage renal failure poses particular concerns as
renal impairment affects drug excretion as well as
absorption and protein binding. Clinical data on the
use of EGFR TKIs in patients on dialysis are scarce
and largely limited to those on haemodialysis. Hong
Kong has adopted a Peritoneal Dialysis First policy
since 1985 and has the highest peritoneal dialysis-to-haemodialysis ratio globally.4 This raises specific
challenges, as drug elimination by peritoneal dialysis
differs from that by haemodialysis. Our case report
represents the first in the literature to demonstrate
the efficacy and safety of erlotinib and osimertinib in
a patient on peritoneal dialysis.
There are no recommendations for dose
adjustment when prescribing erlotinib in the presence
of renal impairment. Erlotinib is mainly metabolised
in the liver by the cytochrome P450 system, primarily
CYP3A4 (80%). Renal excretion plays a minor role
in its elimination (around 9%).5 Pharmacokinetic
analysis in lung cancer patients with chronic renal
failure undergoing haemodialysis showed that
erlotinib plasma levels were similar before and after
dialysis, possibly due to its high protein binding of
up to 95%.5 There are no pharmacokinetic data for
erlotinib in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.
For osimertinib, no dosage adjustment is
necessary in mild-to-moderate renal impairment,
but it is not recommended for patients with
creatinine clearance below 15 mL/min according
to the United States Food and Drug Administration
labelling.6 Osimertinib is mainly eliminated by
hepatic metabolism (68%), with 14% undergoing
renal excretion.7 In a pharmacokinetic study of
osimertinib in renally impaired patients, parameters
were similar between the control group, comprising
patients with normal renal function, and two groups
stratified by severity of renal impairment (estimated
glomerular filtration rates 30-50 mL/min/1.73 m2
and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2).7 Nonetheless, a higher
incidence and severity of toxicities were observed in
the two groups with renally impaired patients.7 For
patients on haemodialysis, safety data and clinical
outcomes with osimertinib are limited to case reports
and small pharmacokinetic studies, which suggest
that it can be administered safely. One case report
demonstrated that therapeutic drug monitoring may
be useful: osimertinib 80 mg daily resulted in grade
3 fatigue in a patient on haemodialysis, but dose
adjustment guided by periodic plasma concentration monitoring achieved sustained stable disease for
more than a year without recurrence of toxicities.8
Although therapeutic drug monitoring may not be
routinely available, careful clinical monitoring for
adverse effects during administration of EGFR TKIs
in patients with renal impairment is warranted.
Drug suspension and dosage adjustments may be
undertaken at the clinician’s discretion.
In conclusion, there remains room for
exploration regarding the use of EGFR TKIs in
patients with end-stage renal failure on peritoneal
dialysis. This case demonstrates that both erlotinib
and osimertinib exhibited a tolerable safety profile
and reasonable treatment efficacy in patients on
peritoneal dialysis and may be administered by
clinicians with close monitoring.
Author contributions
Both authors contributed to the concept or design, acquisition
of data, analysis or interpretation of data, drafting of the
manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript for
important intellectual content. Both authors had full access to
the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version
for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and
integrity.
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
Conflicts of interest
Both authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful to the patient and their family for their support.
Funding/support
This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Ethics approval
The patient was treated in accordance with the Declaration of
Helsinki. As the patient is deceased, her elder sister, as next of
kin, provided written consent for publication of the case report.
References
1. Cancer Online Resource Hub. Cancers in Hong Kong: Common cancers in Hong Kong. Lung cancer. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov.hk/en/hong_kong_cancer/common_cancers_in_hong_kong/lung_cancer.html . Accessed 30 Mar 2026.
2. Shi Y, Au JS, Thongprasert S, et al. A prospective, molecular epidemiology study of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology (PIONEER). J Thorac Oncol 2014;9:154–62. Crossref
3. Lin JJ, Cardarella S, Lydon CA, et al. Five-year survival in EGFR-mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with EGFR-TKIs. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:556–65. Crossref
4. Li PK, Lu W, Mak SK, et al. Peritoneal dialysis first policy in Hong Kong for 35 years: global impact. Nephrology (Carlton) 2022;27:787–94. Crossref
5. Togashi Y, Masago K, Fukudo M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of erlotinib and its active metabolite OSI‑420 in patients with non–small cell lung cancer and chronic renal failure who are undergoing hemodialysis. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:601–5. Crossref
6. United States Food and Drug Administration. Tagrisso (osimertinib) tablet, for oral use: highlights of prescribing information and full prescribing information. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/208065s000lbl.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2026.
7. Fujiwara Y, Makihara R, Hase T, et al. Pharmacokinetic and dose-finding study of osimertinib in patients with impaired renal function and low body weight. Cancer Sci 2023;114:2087–97. Crossref
8. Tabata K, Aoki M, Miyata R, et al. Successful treatment with osimertinib based on therapeutic drug monitoring in a hemodialysis patient with non–small cell lung cancer: a case report. Case Rep Oncol 2023;16:705–10. Crossref

