Hong Kong Med J 2025;31:Epub 23 Sep 2025
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Parental depression in the relationship between parental stress and child health among low-income families in Hong Kong
Esther YT Yu, FRACGP, FHKAM (Family Medicine)1; Eric YF Wan, PhD, CStat1,2; Rosa SM Wong, PhD3; Ivy L Mak, PhD1; Kiki SN Liu, PhD1; Caitlin HN Yeung, MB, BS, MPH1; Patrick Ip, FRCPCH, FHKAM (Paediatrics)4,5; Agnes FY Tiwari, PhD, FAAN6; Weng Y Chin, FRACGP1; Emily TY Tse, FRACGP, FHKAM (Family Medicine)1; Carlos KH Wong, PhD1,2,7; Vivian Y Guo, PhD8; Cindy LK Lam, MD, FHKAM (Family Medicine)1
1 Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
3 Department of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
4 Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
5 Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
6 School of Nursing, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
7 Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited, Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong SAR, China
8 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
 
Corresponding author: Dr Eric YF Wan (yfwan@hku.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Low-income families face increased exposure to stressors, including material hardship and limited social support, which contribute to poor health outcomes. The poor health and behavioural problems in children from these families may exacerbate parental stress. This study explored the bidirectional relationship between parental stress and child health, along with its mediators and moderators, among low-income families in Hong Kong.
 
Methods: In total, 217 families were recruited from two less affluent communities between 2016 and 2017; they were followed up at 12 and 24 months. Each parent-child pair was assessed using parent-completed questionnaires on socio-demographics, medical history, parental stress, health-related quality of life, child health and behaviour, family harmony, parenting style, and neighbourhood cohesion.
 
Results: Thirty-eight parents (17.5%) reported significantly higher levels of stress than the control group. These individuals were more likely to be single parents (41.2% vs 18.5%), victims of intimate partner abuse (23.7% vs 10.9%), have a household income below 50% of the Hong Kong population median (50.0% vs 29.9%), and be diagnosed with mental illnesses (23.7% vs 5.1%). A bidirectional inverse relationship was observed between parental stress and child health at respective time points, with cross-effects from baseline child health to later parental stress, and from baseline parental stress to later child health. The relationship was mediated by the level of parental depression.
 
Conclusion: Parental stress both precedes and results from child health and behavioural problems, with reciprocal short-term and long-term effects. Screening and intervention for parental depression are needed to mitigate the impacts of stress on health among parents and children.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • Single parents, victims of intimate partner abuse, individuals with mental illnesses, and/or those living in poverty reported significantly higher levels of stress compared to other low-income parents in Hong Kong.
  • A bidirectional inverse relationship was observed between general parental stress and child health over a 24-month period among low-income families in Hong Kong.
  • Parental depression mediated the relationship between parental stress and child health.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Active screening for parental depression among at-risk parents in low-income communities is urgently needed to enable early intervention and reduce long-term negative impacts on child health.
 
 
Introduction
Low-income families face increased exposure to stressors,1 2 such as material hardship, dispossession, limited social support,3 4 trauma, and violence,1 5 which subsequently affect family relationships and the physical and mental health of parents,6 7 8 contributing to household-wide feelings of stigma, isolation, and exclusion. These stressors are particularly relevant to Hong Kong, where approximately one-fifth of the population lives below the poverty line.9 Adults from low-income families in Hong Kong have reported significantly lower health-related quality of life (HRQOL) than age- and sex-matched individuals from the general population; low income is significantly associated with poorer mental health.10
 
Stressors may persist across the life course and affect the next generation, resulting in intergenerational socio-economic inequality and health disparities. Early caregiving experiences have been linked to later-life child health outcomes through physiological stress responses.11 Moreover, poor mental health in parents may lead to family disharmony and maladaptive parenting practices, which can increase a child’s risk of adverse health outcomes.7 8 Specifically, children of parents with depression tend to exhibit more difficult temperaments and diminished psychosocial functioning.12 13 Children from low-income families in Hong Kong have reported poorer health and more behavioural problems relative to population norms for similar age-groups.14 15 Without adequate parental care and guidance, such children may be more vulnerable to academic difficulties and behavioural problems, thereby exacerbating parental stress. A bidirectional relationship between parental stress and child health has been documented in Western studies6 8 but not within the Chinese context.
 
Stress coping can be mediated or moderated by various social factors.16 17 For instance, stressed parents may contribute to family disharmony, which mediates diminished child health. Neighbourhood cohesion may moderate this relationship by alleviating parental stress and enhancing children’s well-being. The identification of mediators and moderators that may influence the relationship between parental stress and child health enables development of targeted interventions and policy recommendations. Despite strong associations of parental depression with stress18 and child health,12 13 its mediating role in this relationship remains unclear. A recent study demonstrated mediation between parental stress and parent-infant bonding,19 but evidence concerning overall child health is lacking. This study aimed to explore whether a bidirectional relationship exists between parental stress and child health and to identify its mediators and moderators, with the goal of promoting health among parents and children from low-income families in Hong Kong. We hypothesised that parental stress precedes and results from child health, with mediating and moderating effects exerted by factors illustrated in Figure 1.
 

Figure 1. Study concept map based on existing knowledge of the associations of parental, child and family factors with parental stress and child health
 
Methods
Study design
This prospective cohort study involved 217 parent-child pairs in which at least one parent was the primary caregiver and at least one parent was employed, with a monthly household income lower than 75% of the Hong Kong median at baseline. This income criterion included working poor families who lived above the poverty line (50% of the population median) and received limited government support. Families were recruited by research staff when attending health assessments during our previous cohort study20 performed in two less affluent Hong Kong communities between May 2016 and October 2017. Parents unable to communicate in Chinese, as well as children born prematurely and/or with congenital deformities, were excluded. All parents provided written informed consent for themselves and their child to participate in the study. Sample size was determined based on the need to detect a difference in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) scores between children of parents with high and low stress levels, classified according to the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) stress subscale scores. Our previous cohort study showed that average CHQ general health perceptions subscale scores in children of parents with high and low DASS stress subscale scores were 59 (standard deviation [SD]=17) and 65 (SD=16), respectively20 (effect size=0.4). A sample size of 200 (100 per group) parent-child pairs was required to detect a difference of 6 points in CHQ general health perceptions subscale score between groups using an independent t test with 80% power and a 5% level of significance.
 
Data collection
Each parent-child pair was invited to complete a comprehensive questionnaire survey at three time points (ie, baseline, 12 months, and 24 months) covering parental stress, HRQOL, and mental health; child’s general health, HRQOL, and behaviour; family harmony; parenting style; and neighbourhood cohesion, as reported by the parent. Potential confounders were recorded at baseline, including parental age, gender, education level, marital status, employment status, household income, smoking habits, and alcohol consumption, as well as the child’s age, gender, estimated intelligence quotient, and special education needs. Physical and mental co-morbidities in parents and children were recorded at all three time points.
 
Study instruments
Exposure
Parental stress was measured using the stress subscale of the DASS–21 items questionnaire.21 A cut-off score of ≥15 indicated the presence of significant parental stress.21 The scale has been validated in a Chinese population.22
 
Primary outcome
Child health was measured using the general health perceptions subscale score from the CHQ–Parent Form 50.23 A higher score indicates better perceived physical and psychological HRQOL in the child based on parental proxy report. The Chinese version has demonstrated good psychometric properties in local Chinese children.20
 
Potential mediators/moderators
The Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9)24 was used to screen for parental depression. A cut-off score of ≥10 was regarded as clinically significant depression. The Chinese version of the PHQ-9 was validated and used in our previous study.20 Family harmony was measured using the Family Harmony Scale–Short Form (FHS-5).25 Higher single-factor harmony scores reflect greater harmony. The Chinese version has demonstrated good psychometric properties in local Chinese households.25 Parent-child interaction was assessed using the Child Physical Assault and Neglect subscales of the Parent–Child Conflict Tactics Scale (CTSPC).26 Higher scores indicate higher frequencies of respective issues in the past 12 months. The translated traditional Chinese version has demonstrated good psychometric properties.27 Parenting style was assessed using the Authoritative Parenting Style subscale of the short version of the Parenting Style and Dimensions Questionnaire.28 A higher score indicates a stronger tendency towards authoritative parenting. The questionnaire has been validated in the Chinese cultural setting.29 Neighbourhood support was measured using the Neighbourhood Collective Efficacy Scale.30 Higher scores indicate greater neighbourhood cohesion. The scale has been tested in Chinese in a local study.31
 
Data analysis
Baseline characteristics of parent-child pairs and their households were summarised using descriptive statistics. Differences between groups according to parental stress level were assessed using independent t tests for continuous variables and the Chi squared test for categorical variables.
 
The longitudinal bidirectional relationship between parental stress and child health was assessed using a cross-lagged panel model. Multiple indicators were utilised to evaluate model goodness-of-fit. A statistically non-significant Chi squared P value, Comparative Fit Index and Tucker-Lewis Index >0.95, root mean square error of approximation ≤0.05, and standardised root mean residual >0.08 were considered indicative of desirable goodness-of-fit. The final model was selected using root mean square error of approximation–based forward stepwise selection.
 
A mediation model was used to evaluate candidate mediators. Model estimates were obtained using 5000 bootstrapping samples. A statistically significant indirect effect, along with a reduced direct effect magnitude relative to the total effect, indicated that a given mediator explained the relationship between parental stress and child health.32 A multi-mediator model was constructed; differences in indirect effects between mediators were estimated via pairwise comparison.
 
Potential moderating effects of neighbourhood cohesion and parenting style on the relationship between parental stress and child health were examined by multivariable linear regression. A statistically significant interaction term coefficient indicated a moderation effect. All variables were centred to a mean of zero to reduce multicollinearity related to interaction terms. Confounders were included to improve model goodness-of-fit; R2 and adjusted R2 values were used to evaluate model performance.
 
All descriptive analyses were performed using Stata 16 (StataCorp LLC, College Station [TX], US); all model analyses were carried out using the lavaan package33 version 0.6-6, in R version 4.0.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Data completion rates are presented in online supplementary Table 1. Complete case analyses were conducted. All tests were two-tailed; P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
 
Results
Among the 217 parent-child pairs recruited at baseline, 175 (80.6%) and 184 (87.6%) pairs attended the 12-month and 24-month follow-ups, respectively (online supplementary Fig 1). Their characteristics at each of the three time points are detailed in Table 1.
 

Table 1. Socio-demographics, co-morbidities, and outcome measures
 
Baseline characteristics of parent-child pairs
At baseline, the ages of parents and children (mean ± SD) were 42.4 ± 6.2 years and 10.7 ± 2.0 years, respectively. Approximately half of the children were girls (47.5%), whereas the parents involved were predominantly mothers (91.7%). The majority (75.2%) of parents had completed secondary education. Approximately 39.8% of primary parents were employed, and 57.2% of families had a monthly household income below 75% of the 2016 Hong Kong median (ie, HK$25 000).34
 
Thirty-eight parents (17.5%) experienced significant stress, indicated by a DASS stress subscale score of 15 or above at baseline. Considerable differences were evident in their baseline characteristics compared with parents who were not stressed. Stressed parents were more likely to be single parents (41.2% vs 18.5%) and to have a household income below 50% of the Hong Kong median (50.0% vs 29.9%). A greater proportion of stressed parents reported being victims of intimate partner abuse (23.7% vs 10.9%). Diagnosed mental illnesses (23.7% vs 5.1%) and depression, indicated by a PHQ-9 score ≥10 (21.1% vs 2.4%), were more prevalent among these parents (Table 2). Both their physical and mental HRQOL were significantly worse (physical component score=42.5 ± 9.9 vs 49.1 ± 8.2; mental component score=38.1 ± 10.0 vs 55.5 ± 8.7; P<0.001).
 

Table 2. Baseline characteristics stratified by parental stress group (n=217)
 
Compared with children of parents who were not stressed, children of stressed parents were younger (age=10.0 ± 2.6 years vs 10.8 ± 1.8 years; P=0.020) and had worse general health and HRQOL, as reflected by lower scores in every subscale of the CHQ–Parent Form 50 except bodily pain and self-esteem. In particular, large differences were observed in four subscales: parental impact—emotional, parental impact—time, family activities, and family cohesion.
 
Moreover, stressed parents reported lower scores in family harmony (FHS-5) and neighbourhood cohesion (Neighbourhood Collective Efficacy Scale). Although parenting style did not differ significantly, stressed parents showed a greater tendency for physical punishment, as reflected by higher scores on the CTSPC–physical assault subscale, and for neglect, as indicated by higher CTSPC–neglect subscale scores, compared with parents who were not stressed (Table 2).
 
Relationship between parental stress and child health over time
Figure 2 shows the cross-lagged panel model examining the bidirectional relationship between parental stress and child health. A bidirectional relationship between child health and parental stress was confirmed. Significant associations were observed between parental stress and child health at each time point (estimates: baseline=-0.22, 12 months=-0.21, 24 months=-0.47); between baseline child health and parental stress at 12 months (estimate=-0.40) and 24 months (estimate=-0.42); and between baseline parental stress and child health at 12 months (estimate=-0.57) and 24 months (estimate=-0.10).
 

Figure 2. Cross-lagged panel model between parental stress and child health
 
Mediators and moderators of the parent-child health relationship over time
The multi-mediation model results generated by bootstrapping are illustrated in Figure 3; the model estimates and goodness-of-fit statistics are presented in online supplementary Table 2. The total effect of the relationship between parental stress and child health was reduced when mediators were included in the model. Significant positive associations of parental stress were observed with the PHQ-9 score, as well as the physical assault and neglect subscales of the CTSPC. A significant negative association was noted between parental stress and the FHS-5 score. Among mediators, only the PHQ-9 exerted a significant negative effect on child health.
 

Figure 3. Multi-mediation model between parental stress and child health
 
Table 3 presents the moderation model. Neither neighbourhood cohesion nor parenting style demonstrated a moderating effect on the relationship between parental stress and child health. Estimates for the interaction terms were negligible. The R2 values were around 0.21, and the adjusted R2 values were slightly lower (0.11-0.13), indicating modest explanatory power of the model after adjusting for confounders.
 

Table 3. Moderation effects of the relationship between parental stress and child health
 
Discussion
Our study demonstrated that a substantial proportion of low-income parents experienced stress (17.5%), which was associated with multiple stressors including poverty, marital problems, intimate partner abuse, family disharmony, and reduced neighbourhood support. Children of stressed parents reported worse general health and HRQOL, as well as more behavioural problems. A short-term and long-term bidirectional inverse relationship between parental stress and child health was confirmed; this relationship was partially mediated by the level of parental depression.
 
Compared with the general Hong Kong population, the parent-child pairs in this study were more exposed to various known stressors in addition to low income. The prevalences of single-parent families (22.3% vs 9.8%35) and intimate partner abuse (13.2% vs 7.2%36) were higher, and more parents reported regular alcohol consumption (17.4% vs 8.7%37). Therefore, it is not surprising that a considerably greater proportion of parents in this study experienced elevated levels of stress (17.5% vs 5.2%38) and depression (5.9% vs 1.2%37). The persistently high level of parental stress observed during the study period may be attributed partly to ongoing exposure to various stressors over time and partly to constant exposure to chronic stressors. Both scenarios highlight the urgent need to ensure assessment and intervention for these disadvantaged parents.
 
Previous studies have demonstrated bidirectional interactions between parental stress and child health in relation to both internalising and externalising behaviours.6 8 Increases in behavioural problems have been shown to raise parental stress over time, which in turn exacerbates behavioural issues in children.39 Our study adds to this body of evidence by confirming significant bidirectional effects between general parental stress and child health at each time point. Cross-effects were observed from baseline child health to later parental stress, and from baseline parental stress to later child health at both 12 and 24 months. These findings suggest that parental stress both precedes and results from child health, with reciprocal short-term and long-term influences.40
 
In our attempt to identify pathways through which parental stress affects child health, we observed that only parental depression significantly mediated the relationship. This result is consistent with previous findings that maternal depression and perceived stress directly and negatively influence child development.41 One possible explanation is that depressed mothers may lack the energy or capacity to provide adequate care and support for their child’s health. Research into this mediation effect remains limited; however, one recent study reported similar outcomes regarding the indirect impact of workrelated stress on child health, mediated by maternal depression.42 The implementation of screening and intervention for parental depression is both imperative and urgent to counteract the adverse effects of stress on parental and child health. Medical and social service providers should collaborate to actively screen at-risk parents from low-income families in the community. Early intervention through lifestyle-based care—such as physical activity, relaxation techniques, and mindfulness-based therapies—can help to prevent43 44 and manage45 46 depression, thus mitigating long-term negative impacts on child health.
 
However, it must be noted that parents with depression may be biased towards over-reporting their child’s problems,47 compared with other informants such as teachers and the children themselves.48 Further research is warranted to identify individual and family characteristics that may influence discrepancies between informants. Other potential factors examined in previous studies—such as household structure (dual- vs multi-generational), parental rearing behaviours, and confident and affective social support—might also contribute to the relationship between parental stress and child health; they should be explored in future studies with larger sample sizes.
 
Strengths and limitations
This is one of the first studies to examine the longitudinal relationship between general parental stress and child health, enabling assessment of possible causal relationships between the two outcomes. Specifically, we recruited vulnerable families with substantial socio-economic disadvantages who experience high levels of stress and would benefit most from future interventions. Furthermore, a high response rate was maintained throughout the study, ensuring adequate power for the analyses.
 
However, the findings of our study must be interpreted in light of the following limitations. First, although we conducted a comprehensive analysis of factors related to parental stress and child health, the outcomes were based on self-reported assessments, which are susceptible to respondent bias. Only three measurements, taken 1 year apart, were performed in this study due to concerns regarding practicality and the burden on participating families. Therefore, caution should be exercised in generalising the results with respect to longitudinal trends, given that substantial intra-individual fluctuations may have occurred but were not captured in this study. Second, both parental stress and child health were assessed using parent-report questionnaires, which may contribute to increased shared method variance. Additionally, aspects of the child’s health or behaviour considered problematic by the parent may not align with assessments made by other individuals (eg, teachers). As mentioned earlier, parents with depression may be biased towards over-reporting problems and are more likely to report behavioural issues in their child compared with other informants.47 48 The validity of parent-perceived measures of child health—particularly in relation to parental depression—and their agreement with other caregivers should be examined in future trials specifically designed for this purpose. Third, there were unmeasured confounders in this observational study, such as exercise and social functioning. Moreover, certain socio-demographic factors, including marital and employment statuses, were assumed to be static throughout the study. It remains uncertain whether changes in these factors, if any, may have influenced the observed results. Additional information regarding participant characteristics, observational measures of child behaviour, or objective indicators of child health (eg, cortisol levels) could improve the reliability of the findings.
 
Conclusion
This study showed that a substantial proportion of parents from low-income families in Hong Kong experienced general stress due to multiple stressors, which was negatively associated with their child’s health. A bidirectional relationship was observed between parental stress and child health over time, which may be partly mediated by parental depression. Prompt screening and appropriate intervention are necessary to prevent adverse health outcomes for parents and children in low-income families.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: EYT Yu, RSM Wong, AFY Tiwari, CKH Wong, VY Guo, CLK Lam.
Acquisition of data: RSM Wong, KSN Liu.
Analysis or interpretation of data: EYT Yu, EYF Wan, RSM Wong, IL Mak, AFY Tiwari, CKH Wong, VY Guo, CLK Lam.
Drafting of the manuscript: EYT Yu, RSM Wong, IL Mak, CHN Yeung.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
As advisors of the journal, EYT Yu and CKH Wong were not involved in the peer review process. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful for the support from Kerry Group Kuok Foundation (Hong Kong) Limited in conducting this study on participants of the Trekkers Family Enhancement Scheme. The authors’ sincere gratitude goes to the Neighbourhood Advice-Action Council, Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui Lady MacLehose Centre, and Shek Lei Community Hall for their assistance in participant recruitment and provision of venues for data collection, respectively. The authors thank the Social Science Research Centre of The University of Hong Kong (HKU) for their timely completion of the telephone surveys, and Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine of HKU for performing the assays for DNA extraction and telomere length measurement. The authors also thank the hard work of their research staff in data collection and analysis.
 
Declaration
The study results were disseminated through a poster presentation at the Health Research Symposium 2021 (23 November 2021, hybrid conference), entitled “In-depth exploration of a bidirectional parent-child health relationship and its mediating and moderating factors among low-income families in Hong Kong”.
 
Funding/support
This research was supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund of the Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government (Ref No.: HMRF 14151571). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation, or manuscript preparation.
 
Ethics approval
This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster, Hong Kong (Ref No.: UW 16-415). Informed consent was obtained from patients when baseline data were collected.
 
Supplementary material
The supplementary material was provided by the authors and some information may not have been peer reviewed. Accepted supplementary material will be published as submitted by the authors, without any editing or formatting. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine and the Hong Kong Medical Association. The Hong Kong Academy of Medicine and the Hong Kong Medical Association disclaim all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content.
 
References
1. Santiago CD, Kaltman S, Miranda J. Poverty and mental health: how do low-income adults and children fare in psychotherapy? J Clin Psychol 2013;69:115-26. Crossref
2. Smith MV, Mazure CM. Mental health and wealth: depression, gender, poverty, and parenting. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2021;17:181-205. Crossref
3. Evans GW, Kim P. Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self-regulation, and coping. Child Dev Perspect 2013;7:43-8. Crossref
4. Adjei NK, Jonsson KR, Straatmann VS, et al. Impact of poverty and adversity on perceived family support in adolescence: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2024;33:3123-32. Crossref
5. Alto ME, Warmingham JM, Handley ED, Manly JT, Cicchetti D, Toth SL. The association between patterns of trauma exposure, family dysfunction, and psychopathology among adolescent females with depressive symptoms from low-income contexts. Child Maltreat 2023;28:130-40. Crossref
6. van Dijk W, de Moor MH, Oosterman M, Huizink AC, Matvienko-Sikar K. Longitudinal relations between parenting stress and child internalizing and externalizing behaviors: testing within-person changes, bidirectionality and mediating mechanisms. Front Behav Neurosci 2022;16:942363. Crossref
7. Neece CL, Green SA, Baker BL. Parenting stress and child behavior problems: a transactional relationship across time. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil 2012;117:48-66. Crossref
8. Stone LL, Mares SH, Otten R, Engels RC, Janssens JM. The co-development of parenting stress and childhood internalizing and externalizing problems. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2016;38:76-86. Crossref
9. Economic Analysis Division Economic Analysis and Business Facilitation Unit Financial Secretary’s Office; Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Hong Kong Poverty Situation Report 2013. Oct 2014. Available from: https://www.commissiononpoverty.gov.hk/eng/pdf/poverty_report13_rev2.pdf. Accessed 31 Jul 2023.
10. Lam CL, Guo VY, Wong CK, Yu EY, Fung CS. Poverty and health-related quality of life of people living in Hong Kong: comparison of individuals from low-income families and the general population. J Public Health (Oxf) 2017;39:258-65.Crossref
11. Luecken LJ, Lemery KS. Early caregiving and physiological stress responses. Clin Psychol Rev 2004;24:171-91. Crossref
12. Hanington L, Ramchandani P, Stein A. Parental depression and child temperament: assessing child to parent effects in a longitudinal population study. Infant Behav Dev 2010;33:88-95. Crossref
13. Associations between depression in parents and parenting, child health, and child psychological functioning. In: England MJ, Sim LJ, editors. Depression in Parents, Parenting, and Children: Opportunities to Improve Identification, Treatment, and Prevention. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009: 119-82.
14. Lee SL, Cheung YF, Wong HS, Leung TH, Lam T, Lau YL. Chronic health problems and health-related quality of life in Chinese children and adolescents: a population-based study in Hong Kong. BMJ Open 2013;3:e001183. Crossref
15. Chan KL, Lo CK, Ho FK, Chen Q, Chen M, Ip P. Modifiable factors for the trajectory of health-related quality of life among youth growing up in poverty: a prospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:9221. Crossref
16. Asok A, Bernard K, Roth TL, Rosen JB, Dozier M. Parental responsiveness moderates the association between early-life stress and reduced telomere length. Dev Psychopathol 2013;25:577-85. Crossref
17. Evans GW, Kim P, Ting AH, Tesher HB, Shannis D. Cumulative risk, maternal responsiveness, and allostatic load among young adolescents. Dev Psychol 2007;43:341-51. Crossref
18. Hammen C. Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005;1:293-319. Crossref
19. Power C, Weise V, Mack JT, Karl M, Garthus-Niegel S. Does parental mental health mediate the association between parents’ perceived stress and parent-infant bonding during the early COVID-19 pandemic? Early Hum Dev 2024;189:105931. Crossref
20. Fung CS, Yu EY, Guo VY, et al. Development of a Health Empowerment Programme to improve the health of working poor families: protocol for a prospective cohort study in Hong Kong. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010015. Crossref
21. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF; Psychology Foundation of Australia. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Sydney: Sydney Psychology Foundation; 1995. Crossref
22. Wang K, Shi HS, Geng FL, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale–21 in China. Psychol Assess 2016;28:e88-100. Crossref
23. Landgraf JM. Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ). In: Maggino F, editor. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-being Research. Cham: Springer; 2020: 1-6. Crossref
24. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606-13. Crossref
25. Kavikondala S, Stewart SM, Ni MY, et al. Structure and validity of Family Harmony Scale: an instrument for measuring harmony. Psychol Assess 2016;28:307-18. Crossref
26. Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. J Marriage Fam 1979;41:75-88. Crossref
27. Chan KL, Brownridge DA, Fong DY, Tiwari A, Leung WC, Ho PC. Violence against pregnant women can increase the risk of child abuse: a longitudinal study. Child Abuse Negl 2012;36:275-84. Crossref
28. Robinson CC, Mandleco B, Olsen SF, Hart CH. The Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ). In: Perlmutter BF, Touliatos J, Holden GW, editors. Handbook of Family Measurement Techniques: Vol 3. Instruments & Index. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001: 319-21.
29. Wu P, Robinson CC, Yang C, et al. Similarities and differences in mothers’ parenting of preschoolers in China and the United States. Int J Behav Dev 2002;26:481-91. Crossref
30. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997;277:918-24. Crossref
31. Chou KL. Perceived discrimination and depression among new migrants to Hong Kong: the moderating role of social support and neighborhood collective efficacy. J Affect Disord 2012;138:63-70. Crossref
32. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:1173-82. Crossref
33. Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 2012;48:1-36. Crossref
34. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. Hong Kong 2016 Population By-census–Thematic Report: Household Income Distribution in Hong Kong. Jun 2017. Available from: https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/en/data/stat_report/product/B1120096/att/B11200962016XXXXB0100.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2025.
35. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. 2021 Population Census—Thematic Report: Children. Feb 2023. Available from: https://www.census2021.gov.hk/doc/pub/21c-Children.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2025.
36. Chan KL. Intimate partner violence in Hong Kong. In: Chan KL, editor. Preventing Family Violence: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2012: 19-58. Crossref
37. Non-Communicable Disease Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Hong Kong SAR Government. Report of Population Health Survey 2020-22 (Part I); 2022. Available from: https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/dh_phs_2020-22_part_1_report_eng_rectified.pdf. Accessed 31 Jul 2023.
38. Chan SM, Wong H, Chung RY, Au-Yeung TC. Association of living density with anxiety and stress: a cross-sectional population study in Hong Kong. Health Soc Care Community 2021;29:1019-29. Crossref
39. Baker BL, McIntyre LL, Blacher J, Crnic K, Edelbrock C, Low C. Pre-school children with and without developmental delay: behaviour problems and parenting stress over time. J Intellect Disabil Res 2003;47:217-30. Crossref
40. Motrico E, Bina R, Kassianos AP, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to prevent perinatal depression: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2023;82:47-61. Crossref
41. Vameghi R, Amir Ali Akbari S, Sajedi F, Sajjadi H, Alavi Majd H. Path analysis association between domestic violence, anxiety, depression and perceived stress in mothers and children’s development. Iran J Child Neurol 2016;10:36-48. Crossref
42. Xu L, Xu J. The impact of maternal occupation on children’s health: a mediation analysis using the parametric G-formula. Soc Sci Med 2024;343:116602. Crossref
43. Bellón JÁ, Conejo-Cerón S, Sánchez-Calderón A, et al. Effectiveness of exercise-based interventions in reducing depressive symptoms in people without clinical depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Psychiatry 2021;219:578-87. Crossref
44. Newland P, Bettencourt BA. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based art therapy for symptoms of anxiety, depression, and fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2020;41:101246. Crossref
45. Marx W, Manger SH, Blencowe M, et al. Clinical guidelines for the use of lifestyle-based mental health care in major depressive disorder: World Federation of Societies for Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Australasian Society of Lifestyle Medicine (ASLM) taskforce. World J Biol Psychiatry 2023;24:333-86. Crossref
46. Recchia F, Leung CK, Chin EC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of exercise, antidepressants and their combination in treating non-severe depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med 2022;56:1375-80. Crossref
47. Chi TC, Hinshaw SP. Mother–child relationships of children with ADHD: the role of maternal depressive symptoms and depression-related distortions. J Abnor Child Psychol 2002;30:387-400. Crossref
48. Richters JE. Depressed mothers as informants about their children: a critical review of the evidence for distortion. Psychol Bull 1992;112:485-99. Crossref