Hong Kong Med J 2025;31:Epub 13 Jun 2025
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
EDITORIAL
Medico-socio-legal collaboration in the primary care setting in Hong Kong
Emily TY Tse, MB, BS, FHKAM (Family Medicine)1,2; Albert Lee, LLM3,4; Kar-wai Tong, JSD, PhD5; Peiyi Lu, PhD6; Jane E Parry, PhD1; Cecilia LW Chan, PhD, RSW6; William CW Wong, MD, FRCGP1,2
1 Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Department of Family Medicine, The University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
3 The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
4 Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
5 City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
6 Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Corresponding author: Dr William CW Wong (wongwcw@hku.hk)

There is a well-established association between
health, social and environmental factors, many of
which are amenable to legal interventions.1 2 Legal
issues affect health in multiple ways by structuring,
perpetuating, and mediating the social determinants
of health found in the dynamic interconnections
between the medical, social, and legal arenas.3
Examples include legal issues related to housing
(such as the threat of eviction or environmental
health hazards due to substandard housing), financial
disputes, domestic violence, and other forms of
physical or sexual abuse.4 Medico-socio-legal
collaboration, from a medical perspective, refers to
a health-related case with social and legal implications
to the extent that an attending doctor, after eliciting
the patient’s history and conducting a physical
examination, seeks input from social workers or
requests investigation by law enforcement agencies
to benefit the patient and especially to improve
their health outcomes.5 In various settings, notably
Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States,
primary care practitioners have brought legal advice
directly to their patients through medico-socio-legal
partnerships, to help address legal issues that
have been identified in primary care settings as
deleterious to patient health.6
Legal services offered in the primary care
setting are typically provided in partnership with a
full-service legal aid clinic, rather than by having a
lawyer on staff. This is because the legal advice given
is by nature often complex and specialised, and
also because of the privileged nature of the client–legal service provider relationship. These services
are often most effectively offered in the context of
team-based care, where a multidisciplinary group
of professionals works together to address patients’
needs in a more holistic way, rather than focusing
solely on their medical conditions, and to look at
underlying social and legal issues that are affecting
their health. Examples of well-established legal
services in primary care include the legal clinic at McMaster Family Practice7 and the Health Justice
Program offered by St Michael’s Academic Family
Health Team, both in Toronto, Canada.8 Colvin et al9
reported that the engagement of social workers
significantly enhanced the effectiveness of the
existing medico-legal partnership.
In Hong Kong, there are a number of medical
and social collaboration programmes linking public
hospitals and non-governmental organisations
(NGOs) to serve the population. An example is the
Jockey Club End of Life Community Care Project,
which specialises in end-of-life care for older
citizens.10 However, the integration of legal advice into
the primary care setting as a form of medico-social
collaboration has thus far remained unexplored.
Based on international experience, and given the
high levels of poverty and social deprivation in the
city, along with evidence of their deleterious effects
on health, it is likely that there are issues that could be
amenable to amelioration through legal advice. What
remains unknown is which legal issues would arise
if such a service were made available in the primary
care setting in Hong Kong, and the extent to which a
service would be appreciated by patients.
Our team, comprising family physicians from
the Department of Family Medicine and Primary
Care, The University of Hong Kong, along with
experts in social work and legal training, conducted
four sessions of medico-socio-legal consultations
at the Kwai Tsing District Health Centre and the
Kowloon City District Health Centre Express in April
and May 2024. We began with a talk on common
medico-socio-legal issues such as chronic diseases,
mental health, and advance directives, followed
by individual consultations with experts from the
three fields. In total, 37 clients (32 female and 5
male) were recruited by two collaborating NGOs—the Lok Sin Tong Benevolent Society Kowloon and
the Kwai Tsing Safe Community and Healthy City
Association—to attend the individual consultations.
Taken together, their concerns reflected the core values of family medicine, namely, that
biopsychosocial issues are intertwined. Examples
included financial difficulties and marital
concerns, either resulting from health conditions
or contributing to them; obstacles in accessing
Mandatory Provident Fund investments due to
health issues; caregiver stress in addition to chronic
illness; litigation involving inheritance and housing
issues; transfer of legal property rights; and disputes
among family members. In follow-up calls, most
clients reported experiencing both physical and
psychological relief from having their concerns
heard and addressed in a one-stop “clinic” within
the community setting, where experts from all three
fields provided coordinated advice. In one case, a
client who had been embroiled in a civil legal dispute
for years continued to express anger and health-related
concerns during follow-up, prompting our
team to consider longer-term needs for medico-socio-legal collaboration in the primary care setting.
After the consultations, the majority of clients
affirmed that the sessions had strengthened their
physical and mental health. They expressed hope
to see more joint clinics of this nature within the
primary care setting. As service providers, we found
that it was both feasible and effective to implement
a medico-socio-legal clinic to alleviate patients’
physical and psychological suffering by providing
comprehensive information from relevant experts
to address their problems. The unique feature of our
initiative was the integration of expert input from
medical, social, and legal perspectives.
The way forward
The overarching aim of this initiative was to raise
awareness of the health impact of legal issues,
acknowledge the interactions between social
determinants and health, and propose interventions
that promote health justice within Hong Kong’s
primary healthcare system. We seek to highlight the
current service gap and explore the possibility of
establishing sustainable medico-socio-legal clinics
in the primary healthcare setting. Cross-sector
collaboration in primary care can be strengthened
by identifying opportunities and resources for the
government or NGOs in the public sector—and for
newly established District Health Centres supporting
private healthcare providers—to develop such joint
clinics and offer improved services.
Author contributions
Concept or design: WCW Wong, JE Parry.
Acquisition of data: WCW Wong, ETY Tse, PY Lu, CLW Chan, A Lee, KW Tong.
Drafting of the manuscript: JE Parry, ETY Tse.
Acquisition of data: WCW Wong, ETY Tse, PY Lu, CLW Chan, A Lee, KW Tong.
Drafting of the manuscript: JE Parry, ETY Tse.
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgement
The authors acknowledge administrative support for client
recruitment and provision of service venues by the Lok Sin
Tong Benevolent Society Kowloon and the Kwai Tsing Safe
Community and Healthy City Association, in their respective
District Health Centre Express in Kowloon City and District
Health Centre in Kwai Chung. Special thanks to Mr Eugene KY
Chan for providing administrative assistance to the project and
contributing to the initial draft of this article.
Declaration
The content of this editorial has been presented as oral presentation in the 26th WONCA Asia Pacific Regional Conference (WONCA APR 2025) in Busan, Republic of Korea,
24-27 April 2025.
Funding/support
This editorial received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
1. Gottlieb L, Hessler D, Long D, Amaya A, Adler N. A
randomized trial on screening for social determinants of
health: the iScreen study. Pediatrics 2014;134:e1611-8. Crossref
2. Klein MD, Beck AF, Henize AW, Parrish DS, Fink EE,
Kahn RS. Doctors and lawyers collaborating to HeLP
children—outcomes from a successful partnership
between professions. J Health Care Poor Underserved
2013;24:1063-73. Crossref
3. Gostin LO, Monahan JT, Kaldor J, et al. The legal
determinants of health: harnessing the power of law
for global health and sustainable development. Lancet
2019;393:1857-910. Crossref
4. Sandel M, Hansen M, Kahn R, et al. Medical-legal
partnerships: transforming primary care by addressing
the legal needs of vulnerable populations. Health Aff
(Millwood) 2010;29:1697-705. Crossref
5. Law Insider. Medico-Legal definition. Available from:
https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/medico-legal. Accessed 17 Jul 2024.
6. Parry J, Vanstone M, Grignon M, Dunn JR. Primary
care-based interventions to address the financial needs
of patients experiencing poverty: a scoping review of the
literature. Int J Equity Health 2021;20:219. Crossref
7. Agarwal G, Pirrie M, Edwards D, et al. Effect of a legal clinic
program within an urban primary health care center on
social determinants of health: a program evaluation. J Prim
Care Community Health 2024;15:21501319241245849. Crossref
8. Drozdzal G, Shoucri R, Macdonald J, Radford K, Pinto AD,
Persaud N. Integrating legal services with primary care: The
Health Justice Program. Can Fam Physician 2019;65:246-8.
9. Colvin JD, Nelson B, Cronin K. Integrating social workers
into medical-legal partnerships: comprehensive problem
solving for patients. Soc Work 2012;57:333-41. Crossref
10. Jockey Club End-of-Life Community Care Project. “Life
Rainbow” End-of-life Care Services. Medical Social
Collaboration Approach in End-of-Life Care: Experience
from a Multidisciplinary Program. Available from: https://foss.hku.hk/jcecc/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/P4.2_Ying-Ying-HO_Revised.pdf. Accessed 17 Jul 2024.