Hong Kong Med J 2025;31:Epub 3 Jun 2025
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Respiratory syncytial virus: the battle continues
Julian WT Tang, PhD, FRCPath1,2
1 Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
2 Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
Corresponding author: Dr Julian WT Tang (jwtang49@hotmail.com)

To the Editor—I read the article by Hon et al1 with
interest. Although the seasonality of respiratory
syncytial virus (RSV) is mostly year-round in
tropical and subtropical regions, this should not be
a barrier to universal maternal RSV vaccination.2
This approach could work well in Hong Kong, as
unlike the monoclonals, the RSV vaccine’s effects
are designed to be longer-lasting, and all pregnant
women are eligible. In contrast to its much more
restricted predecessor, palivizumab, nirsevimab has
fewer limitations and can be given to all newborns,
providing protection against RSV for up to 5 months
after a single dose. Due to its more limited duration
of protection, the recommendation is for it to be
administered just before the onset of the RSV season
(eg, during September/October to March in the
Northern Hemisphere).2 3 Nirsevimab can still be
given to particularly vulnerable babies following
maternal vaccination, especially when vaccination
occurs within 14 days of delivery since the maternal
vaccine response can take up to 2 weeks to develop.3
In addition, the United States Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention recommends that non-vulnerable
babies above 8 months of age should not
receive nirsevimab, and it is not recommended for
any baby over 20 months.3 Nonetheless, the optimal
scheduling, combination and effectiveness of these
two interventions (RSV vaccines vs monoclonals)
clearly require further experience. In the meantime,
recommendations from different countries can be
confusing, and the local teams in Hong Kong may
find it useful to wait a little longer before developing
their own local guidelines. Therefore, I agree with
the authors that no new practice recommendations
should be made at this time regarding RSV vaccines or the long-acting monoclonal nirsevimab.
Author contributions
The author contributed to the letter and critical revision of
the letter for important intellectual content. The author had
full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the
final version for publication, and takes responsibility for its
accuracy and integrity.
Conflicts of interest
The author has disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Funding/support
This letter received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
1. Hon KL, Cheung EW, Li AM, et al. Practice
recommendations for respiratory syncytial virus
prophylaxis among children in Hong Kong. Hong Kong
Med J 2025;31:48-57. Crossref
2. Benzaken TR, Watson C, Drysdale SB. Prevention of
respiratory syncytial virus disease by immunisation. Arch
Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2024:edpract-2024-326964. Crossref
3. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. RSV
Immunization Guidance for Infants and Young Children.
30 Aug 2024. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/rsv/hcp/vaccine-clinical-guidance/infants-young-children.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2025.