Hong Kong Med J 2023 Jun;29(3):224–32 | Epub 12 Jun 2023
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Descriptive analysis of poisoning cases involving attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medications in Hong Kong
L Gao, MSc1; Kenneth KC Man, PhD1,2; ML Tse, MB, ChB3; Anthony TY Chow, MB, BS3; Kirstie HTW Wong, BSc4; Esther W Chan, PhD1; Celine SL Chui, PhD5,6; David Coghill, MD7; KL Hon, MB, BS, MD8; Patrick Ip, MB, BS4; Ian CK Wong, PhD1,2
1 Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, Research Department of Policy and Practice, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom
3 Hong Kong Poison Information Centre, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
4 Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
5 School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
6 School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
7 Department of Paediatrics and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
8 Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
 
Corresponding author: Prof Ian CK Wong (wongick@hku.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: The number of poisoning cases involving attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications has reportedly risen with their increased use. However, there is limited relevant evidence from Asia. We analysed the characteristics of poisoning events involving these medications in Hong Kong.
 
Methods: We retrieved data regarding ADHD medication–related poisoning cases from the Hong Kong Poison Information Centre and conducted a descriptive analysis of the demographic information and poisoning information including sources of cases, exposure reason, exposure location, and outcome. The HKPIC data were linked with the Hospital Authority Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) via de-identified Accident and Emergency numbers of public hospitals to investigate clinical characteristics. We also retrieved ADHD medication prescription records from the CDARS, then compared trends between poisoning cases and ADHD medication use.
 
Results: We identified 72 poisoning cases involving ADHD medications between 2009 and 2019, of which approximately 70% occurred in the affected individual’s residence; most were intentional poisoning events (65.3%). No statistically significant association was observed between ADHD medication prescription trends and poisoning events involving ADHD medications. Of the 66 cases (91.7%) successfully linked to CDARS, 40 (60.6%) occurred in individuals with ADHD (median age: 14 years); 26 (39.4%) occurred in individuals who lacked ADHD (median age: 33 years) but displayed higher rates of other mental disorders including depression and anxiety.
 
Conclusion: No significant correlation was evident between ADHD medication prescriptions and poisoning events involving ADHD medications. However, medication management and caregiver education must be emphasised to prevent potential poisoning events.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • The number of prescriptions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications increased by 2.6-fold between 2009 and 2019 (from 32 497 to 84 037).
  • In total, 72 poisoning cases involving ADHD medications between 2009 to 2019 were confirmed by the Hong Kong Poison Information Centre, and there was no clear trend regarding the annual number of such cases.
  • No statistically significant correlation was evident between ADHD medication prescriptions and poisoning events involving ADHD medications.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • The management and safe storage of ADHD medications should be strengthened in both ADHD and non-ADHD populations.
  • Appropriate interventions and/or social support for individuals with psychiatric disorders should be planned and implemented to reduce the risk of poisoning.
 
 
Introduction
Acute poisoning by medicines or chemicals is common worldwide; it can lead to death and other serious outcomes. Globally, poison centres are estimated to receive millions of calls each year regarding acute poisoning reports or consultations.1 According to the Hong Kong Poison Information Centre (HKPIC) annual reports from 2009 to 2018, >3000 events of poisoning in Hong Kong each year are potentially caused by medications or chemicals (excluding food poisoning and bites or stings).2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
 
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder in childhood and adolescence.12 13 Because of its inattentiveness, hyperactivity, and impulsivity characteristics, individuals with ADHD have higher risks of intentional and accidental poisoning.14 A recent study showed that ADHD medication use increased in many countries and regions from 2001 to 2015, including the United States (US), the United Kingdom, Australia, and Hong Kong.15 Descriptive analyses of poisoning cases reported to the US16 and Australian poison centres17 showed trends similar to the reported increases in ADHD medication prescriptions. Accordingly, we hypothesised that an increase in ADHD medication prescriptions would lead to an increase in the number of poisoning cases involving ADHD medications in Hong Kong.
 
To our knowledge, there have been no relevant studies regarding trends in poisoning cases involving ADHD medications in Hong Kong; it is unclear whether the increased use of ADHD medications is associated with an increased risk of overall poisoning in Hong Kong. Therefore, this study analysed the trends and characteristics of poisoning events involving ADHD medications in Hong Kong.
 
Methods
Participants and databases
The data used in this study include HKPIC poisoning records for the period between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019, consisting of consultations (poisoning cases in which healthcare professionals consulted the HKPIC for poison information and management advice) and poisoning cases reported to the accident and emergency (A<E) departments under Hospital Authority (HA).11
 
We used A<E numbers, which are de-identified codes generated by the HA, to link data from the HKPIC with poisoning data acquired from the A<E module of the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) of the HA. The CDARS is an electronic health records system that contains patient demographic and clinical information from inpatient, outpatient, and A<E settings. It captures data from all public hospitals and clinics in Hong Kong18 19 20 and has been extensively used for safety studies regarding ADHD and ADHD medications.21 22 23 24 25 Reference keys (ie, de-anonymised identifiers in the CDARS) were used for matched individuals to retrieve relevant diagnostic and prescription information. The data presented are fully anonymised, and the risk of identification is minimal.
 
Statistical analysis
The annual prevalence of poisoning cases involving ADHD medications was calculated, along with the annual prevalence of ADHD medication prescriptions dispensed by the HA; the relationship between the two prevalence trends was examined using a cross-correlation function.26 Demographic and clinical details were summarised to include the exposure reason, exposure location, and clinical outcome of each case. Definitions and classifications of clinical outcomes were acquired from the HKPIC (Table 1).11 Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the association between the annual prevalence of poisoning related to ADHD medications in individuals with ADHD (ie, individuals with an ADHD diagnosis or a prescription for ADHD medication), and the annual prevalence of prescriptions dispensed by the HA. These analyses were conducted using information from the CDARS, including prescriptions and diagnoses. R software (version 4.0.3) and Microsoft Excel 2019 were used for analyses.
 

Table 1. Definitions of clinical outcomes11
 
This descriptive analysis has been reported in accordance with the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist for cross-sectional studies.
 
Results
In total, 72 poisoning cases involving ADHD medications were confirmed by the HKPIC during the period from 2009 to 2019. The trends in all poisoning cases involving ADHD medications and the annual number of ADHD medication prescriptions are shown in Figure 1. The number of ADHD medication prescriptions is increasing annually, from 32 497 in 2009 to 84 037 in 2019; in contrast, although the number of poisoning cases involving ADHD medications has fluctuated, there has been no upward trend. There were similar findings with respect to poisoning cases involving ADHD medications in patients with an ADHD diagnosis or prescription (Fig 1). Notably, from 2014 to 2015, when the rate of increase in ADHD medication prescriptions was faster than in the previous year, the number of poisoning cases involving ADHD medications showed an upward trend. In contrast, when the rate of increase in ADHD medication prescriptions was slower in the previous year, the number of poisoning cases decreased (eg, from 2015 to 2016). However, cross-correlation analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between the number of poisoning cases and the number of ADHD medication prescriptions. At a time lag of 0, the correlations were approximately 0.442 and 0.326 for all poisoning cases involving ADHD medications and poisoning cases involving ADHD medications in patients with ADHD, respectively; these values were within the range of -0.59 to 0.59, indicating the absence of a significant correlation. At a time lag of 1 (ie, 1 year), the correlations were 0.176 and 0.063, respectively; neither correlation was statistically significant.
 

Figure 1. Trends in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication prescriptions and poisoning cases involving ADHD medications in Hong Kong from 2009 to 2019
 
Among the 72 poisoning cases involving 112 substances, most (n=56; 77.8%) were caused by a single ADHD medication (Fig 2). The 112 substances used in the poisoning cases are shown in Figure 3. Each case included at least one type of ADHD medication, the most common of which was methylphenidate (n=70; 95.9%). Furthermore, 17% of the substances that caused poisoning were psychotropic drugs.
 

Figure 2. Summary of substances used in the poisoning cases (n=72)
 

Figure 3. Distribution of 112 substances used in the poisoning cases (n=72)
 
The main characteristics of all poisoning cases involving ADHD medications are shown in Table 2. The two main sources of these poisoning cases were consultation (54.2%) and reporting (40.3%); most exposures occurred in the affected individual’s residence. The exposure reason was intentional poisoning in 47 cases, accidental poisoning in 20 cases, and an adverse reaction in one case. Overall, a minor effect or no adverse effect occurred in 63 cases (87.5%); a moderate effect occurred in five cases, and a major effect occurred in four cases. Detailed information regarding the four cases with major effects is provided in Table 3. The age distribution of affected individuals (among all 72 cases) is shown in Figure 4. Most poisoning cases (66.67%) involving ADHD medications occurred in children and adolescents; intentional poisoning occurred in a much larger proportion of cases among older individuals.
 

Table 2. Characteristics of all poisoning cases involving attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medications in Hong Kong from 2009 to 2019
 

Table 3. Clinical characteristics of cases with major effects
 

Figure 4. Age distribution of affected individuals in the poisoning cases, along with exposure reasons (n=72)
 
In total, 66 cases with an A<E number were matched to CDARS data for 62 individuals (Table 4). Among the remaining six cases which were not successfully linked, three did not have an A<E number in the poisoning record. In total, 40 poisoning cases (median age: 14 years) occurred in 39 individuals with either an ADHD diagnosis or ADHD prescription, and 26 poisoning cases (median age: 33 years) occurred in 23 individuals without ADHD. The sources of poisoning reports and locations of exposure were similar between the two groups. With respect to exposure reason, there were more cases of intentional poisoning among individuals without ADHD (76.9% among individuals without ADHD vs 60.0% among individuals with ADHD); there were also sex-related differences. Among female ADHD patients and among both male and female non-ADHD individuals, more than three-quarters of poisoning events were intentional. However, among male ADHD patients, intentional and accidental poisoning each constituted approximately half of all cases. Furthermore, the distribution of poisoning outcomes differed between individuals with and without ADHD. Among individuals with ADHD, a minor effect or no adverse effect occurred in most cases; a major effect did not occur in any cases. Among individuals without ADHD, a minor effect occurred in >65% of cases; a major effect occurred in four cases. The proportions of poisoning cases caused by a single ADHD medication were 82.5% among individuals with ADHD and 69.2% among individuals without ADHD. Analysis of psychiatric co-morbidities retrieved from the CDARS revealed that individuals without ADHD more frequently had mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, or schizophrenia.
 

Table 4. Characteristics of cases with successful linkage to the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System
 
Discussion
Comparison with other studies
In this study, we analysed the characteristics of poisoning cases involving ADHD medications reported to the HKPIC between 2009 and 2019. Overall, 72 cases were included in our analysis. The most common location of poisoning was the affected individual’s residence, and most cases occurred in children and adolescents. These results are similar to the findings in previous studies, including reports from poison control centres of the US16 showing that 94.5% of cases occurred in the affected individual’s residence, and a report from the Australian New South Wales Poisons Information Centre17 revealing a median age of 17 years among individuals with intentional poisoning involving ADHD medications. These results may be explained by the increased likelihood of household exposure to various drugs, which increases the number of poisoning events that occur in the affected individual’s residence.1 Additionally, children and adolescents are more vulnerable to poisoning involving medications because of their developmental progression, external influences, and inadequate understanding of the relevant dangers.27 According to the HKPIC 2018 annual report,11 more than half (64%) of poisoning events in that year were caused by exposure in the affected individual’s residence, and 21.3% occurred among individuals aged <20 years. Poisoning cases occurred among individuals with ADHD at younger ages, compared with cases among individuals without ADHD; a potential explanation for this difference is that, although ADHD is often a lifelong condition, it is currently more commonly diagnosed in children and adolescents.28 Because of the limited number of poisoning cases, we could not detect a statistically significant correlation between trends in poisoning cases and the number of ADHD prescriptions. The authors of the New South Wales Poisons Information Centre report17 compared intentional exposure to ADHD medications with dispensing information for those medications (using Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data); their analysis revealed parallel trends.
 
Potential explanation of the findings
By using A<E numbers to link poisoning cases with electronic health records from the CDARS, we achieved a high linkage rate (91.7%). Among the poisoning cases that occurred in male individuals with ADHD, intentional and accidental poisoning were equally common; however, among female individuals with ADHD, the most common reason for poisoning was self-harm. This distinction may be related to sex differences in ADHD patients. For example, girls and women are less likely than boys and men to be diagnosed with ADHD; thus, female ADHD patients may have severe symptoms or co-morbidities.29 30 However, with respect to poisoning cases that occurred in individuals without ADHD, exposure reasons were similar among male and female individuals. Although >70% of the poisoning cases were solely caused by ADHD medication, multiple substances (eg, psychiatric medications or other medications) had been used in some cases. Among individuals without ADHD, there were more poisoning cases that involved two or more types of substances. This finding is presumably related to the higher risks of mental disorders (eg, depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders) among individuals without ADHD; all of these mental disorders increase the risk of intentional self-poisoning.31
 
Strengths and limitations
The main strength of this study is that, to our knowledge, it is the first study in Asia to analyse trends in ADHD prescriptions and poisoning involving ADHD medications. Additionally, we used A<E numbers to link data between the HKPIC and the CDARS, yielding detailed co-morbidity and prescription information for affected individuals. The A<E number is a de-identified code generated by the HA, which partially protects each individual’s privacy. In this study, we made full use of information available from various databases and conducted preliminary analyses that will facilitate future research.
 
However, there were some limitations in this study. First, data from the HKPIC were collected from the voluntary poisoning reporting system,11 which may not cover all poisoning cases involving ADHD medications in Hong Kong. This type of limitation is also present in other poison control or information centre reports,16 17 which may omit cases of substance abuse, misuse, or overdose with or without obvious clinical symptoms that are not reported or not detected in electronic health records databases. Additionally, the small sample size limited the statistical power to identify correlations. Second, although we linked HKPIC data to CDARS data, we were only able to obtain all diagnoses and medication records; we could not determine whether subsequent interventions (ie, after poisoning events) were implemented to prevent additional poisoning cases. Finally, medications prescribed in private clinics may not have been recorded, and we could not obtain data regarding the use of unlicensed or illegal medications. However, we expect the numbers of such medications to be relatively low.22 23 Because HA services are available to all Hong Kong residents32 and the majority of children and adolescents with chronic conditions are under the care of the HA,33 our data are likely to be representative of ADHD medications in Hong Kong; however, we currently cannot determine the true rate of poisoning events involving ADHD medications in Hong Kong.
 
Clinical implications
Generally, individuals with ADHD have a higher risk of poisoning (both intentional and accidental). Therefore, safe medication storage and management strategies should be implemented to avoid poisoning events involving ADHD medications.34 Regarding individuals with ADHD, particularly children and adolescents, proper caregiver training is necessary to ensure the safe storage and reasonable disposal of common household medicines.35 In the present study, accidental poisoning events had occurred in approximately 30% of poisoning cases involving ADHD medications; most of these events occurred among individuals aged <12 years. Thus, at least one-quarter of poisoning cases could be prevented by good medication storage strategies. Furthermore, individuals with mental disorders should be supported in the management of their prescriptions. Appropriate psychological intervention and social/family support can also help to reduce the potential for poisoning events.
 
Conclusion
No statistically significant correlation was evident between ADHD medication prescriptions and poisoning events involving ADHD medications. However, it remains important to raise awareness regarding the management and safe storage of medications among individuals with and without ADHD.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: KKC Man, ML Tse, P Ip, ICK Wong.
Acquisition of data: L Gao, ATY Chow, CSL Chui, ML Tse, P Ip, ICK Wong.
Analysis or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: L Gao, KKC Man, KHTW Wong, EW Chan, CSL Chui.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
L Gao, ATY Chow, ML Tse and KHTW Wong declare no conflict of interest. KKC Man is a recipient of the CW Maplethorpe Fellowship and reports grants from the National Institute for Health Research of the United Kingdom, Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong, Horizon 2020 Framework of the European Commission, and personal fees from IQVIA Ltd, outside the submitted work. EW Chan reports honorarium from the Hospital Authority, grants from RGC, the Research Fund Secretariat of the Health Bureau (formerly Food and Health Bureau) and the Narcotics Division of the Security Bureau of the Hong Kong SAR Government, the National Natural Science Fund of China, the Wellcome Trust, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Janssen, Amgen, and Takeda, outside the submitted work. CSL Chui reports grants from Pfizer and personal fees from PrimeVigilance, outside the submitted work. D Coghill reports grants and personal fees from Shire/Takeda, and personal fees from Medice, Servier and Oxford University Press, outside the submitted work. As an editor of the journal, KL Hon was not involved in the peer review process. P Ip reports research grants from the RGC and the Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF) of the Hong Kong SAR Government, outside the submitted work. ICK Wong reports research funding outside the submitted work from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Janssen, Bayer, GSK, Novartis, the RGC, the HMRF, the National Institute for Health Research of the United Kingdom, the European Commission and the National Health and Medical Research Council in Australia, as well as speaker fees from Janssen and Medice in the previous 3 years.
 
Funding/support
This work was supported by the Research Grants Council General Research Fund of the Hong Kong SAR Government (Ref No.: 17125419) to KKC Man, ML Tse, EW Chan, CSL Chui, D Coghill, KL Hon, P Ip and ICK Wong. The funder had no role in study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation, or manuscript preparation.
 
Ethics approval
The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Kowloon Central Cluster/Kowloon East Cluster (Ref No.: KC/KE-20-0173/ER-3) and the Institutional Review Board of The University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (Ref Nos.: UW 20-779 and UW 12-136) of Hospital Authority, Hong Kong. The data presented are fully anonymised, and the risk of identification is minimal. This was a pharmacoepidemiology study without patient contact and therefore informed consent was exempted by the Research Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board.
 
References
1. World Health Organization. World report on child injury prevention. 2008. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241563574. Accessed 23 May 2023.
2. Chan YC, Tse ML, Lau FL. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2009. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2011;18:221-31. Crossref
3. Chan YC, Tse ML, Lau FL. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2010. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2012;19:110-20. Crossref
4. Chan YC, Tse ML, Lau FL. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2011. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2012;19:394-404. Crossref
5. Chan YC, Tse ML, Lau FL. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2012. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2013;20:371-81. Crossref
6. Chan YC, Tse ML, Lau FL. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2013. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2017;21:249-59. Crossref
7. Chan YC, Tse ML, Lau FL. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2014. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2017;22:376-87. Crossref
8. Chan YC, Tse ML, Lau FL. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2015. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2016;23:358-70. Crossref
9. Chan YC, Chan CK, Ng CH, Ng SH, Lau KK, Tse ML. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2016. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2017;24:244-54. Crossref
10. Lau KK, Chow AT, Chan CK, et al. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2017. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2018;25:313-23. Crossref
11. Chow AT, Chan CK, Ng SH, Tse ML. Hong Kong Poison Information Centre: annual report 2018. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2020;27:344-55. Crossref
12. Polanczyk G, de Lima MS, Horta BL, Biederman J, Rohde LA. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:942-8. Crossref
13. Simon V, Czobor P, Bálint S, Mészáros A, Bitter I. Prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2009;194:204-11. Crossref
14. Ruiz-Goikoetxea M, Cortese S, Magallón S, et al. Risk of poisoning in children and adolescents with ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2018;8:7584. Crossref
15. Raman SR, Man KK, Bahmanyar S, et al. Trends in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medication use: a retrospective observational study using population-based databases. Lancet Psychiatry 2018;5:824-35. Crossref
16. King SA, Casavant MJ, Spiller HA, Hodges NL, Chounthirath T, Smith GA. Pediatric ADHD medication exposures reported to US poison control centers. Pediatrics 2018;141:e20173872. Crossref
17. Cairns R, Daniels B, Wood DA, Brett J. ADHD medication overdose and misuse: the NSW Poisons Information Centre experience, 2004-2014. Med J Aust 2016;204:154. Crossref
18. Lau WC, Cheung CL, Man KK, et al. Association between treatment with apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin and risk for osteoporotic fractures among patients with atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2020;173:1-9. Crossref
19. Wong AY, Wong IC, Chui CS, et al. Association between acute neuropsychiatric events and Helicobacter pylori therapy containing clarithromycin. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:828-34.Crossref
20. Lau WC, Chan EW, Cheung CL, et al. Association between dabigatran vs warfarin and risk of osteoporotic fractures among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA 2017;317:1151-8. Crossref
21. Man KK, Lau WC, Coghill D, et al. Association between methylphenidate treatment and risk of seizure: a population-based, self-controlled case-series study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2020;4:435-43. Crossref
22. Man KK, Coghill D, Chan EW, et al. Association of risk of suicide attempts with methylphenidate treatment. JAMA Psychiatry 2017;74:1048-55. Crossref
23. Man KK, Chan EW, Coghill D, et al. Methylphenidate and the risk of trauma. Pediatrics 2015;135:40-8. Crossref
24. Man KK, Coghill D, Chan EW, et al. Methylphenidate and the risk of psychotic disorders and hallucinations in children and adolescents in a large health system. Transl Psychiatry 2016;6:e956. Crossref
25. Man KK, Chan EW, Ip P, et al. Prenatal antidepressant use and risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring: population based cohort study. BMJ 2017;357:j2350. Crossref
26. The Pennsylvania State University Eberly College of Science. STAT 510. Applied time series analysis. 8.2 Cross correlation functions and lagged regressions. Available from: https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat510/lesson/8/8.2. Accessed 3 May 2021.
27. Parang M. What are common causes of poisoning in children? Available from: https://www.webmd.com/children/what-are-common-causes-poisoning-in-children. Accessed 23 May 2023.
28. Scandurra V, Emberti Gialloreti L, Barbanera F, Scordo MR, Pierini A, Canitano R. Neurodevelopmental disorders and adaptive functions: a study of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and/or attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Front Psychiatry 2019;10:673. Crossref
29. Mowlem FD, Rosenqvist MA, Martin J, Lichtenstein P, Asherson P, Larsson H. Sex differences in predicting ADHD clinical diagnosis and pharmacological treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019;28:481-9. Crossref
30. Children and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (CHADD). Women and girls. Available from: https://chadd.org/for-adults/women-and-girls/. Accessed 28 Dec 2020.
31. Zhang J, Song J, Wang J. Adolescent self-harm and risk factors. Asia Pac Psychiatry 2016;8:287-95. Crossref
32. Chan EW, Lau WC, Leung WK, et al. Prevention of dabigatran-related gastrointestinal bleeding with gastroprotective agents: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2015;149:586-95.e3. Crossref
33. Leung GM, Wong IO, Chan WS, Choi S, Lo SV; Health Care Financing Study Group. The ecology of health care in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:577-90. Crossref
34. Gao L, Man KK, Chan EW, et al. Treatment with methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the risk of all-cause poisoning in children and adolescents: a self-controlled case series study. CNS Drugs 2021;35:769-79. Crossref
35. National Health Service, the United Kingdom Government. Poisoning - Prevention. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/poisoning/prevention. Accessed 31 May 2023.