© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
EDITORIAL
Vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccination in
Hong Kong
Paul KS Chan, MD, FRCPath1; Martin CS Wong, MD, MPH2; Eliza LY Wong, PhD, FHKCHSE2
1 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Corresponding author: Prof Paul KS Chan (paulkschan@cuhk.edu.hk)
Although the case fatality rate of coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19) is lower compared
with deadly diseases such as smallpox and Ebola
virus disease,1 the associated health and economic
burden is alarming. Shifting healthcare technology
and facilities to vaccine development and massive
production became an international common goal.
The arrival of COVID-19 vaccines was perceived as
the end of health and economic suffering, and the
rebirth of tourism and many other industries. Data
from clinical trials of vaccines made by both the
new and conventional platforms showed promising
results, but the rolling out of vaccination is really
challenging in some parts of the world.
In 2019 before the emergence of COVID-19,
the World Health Organization (WHO) identified
vaccine hesitancy as one of 10 major threats to global
health.2 Hong Kong has a comprehensive childhood
immunisation programme with an excellent uptake,
and vaccine hesitancy is not often considered a
problem locally. However, there are bits and pieces
of information indicating that this may not be the
case. In May 2009, when the WHO influenza alert
level was raised to Phase 5 signifying that a pandemic
was imminent, our survey indicated that only 47.9%
of healthcare workers at public hospital intended
to accept the flu H1N1 vaccine when available.3
The acceptance for H5N1 vaccine (another flu with
pandemic threat) was even lower (34.8%). Such low
intention to accept turned out to be true when the
vaccination programme for pandemic flu H1N1 was
initiated in Hong Kong.
In early 2005, Hong Kong faced a heavy
flu season due to a new influenza strain (H3N2
Switzerland). The government decided to implement
an extra dose of vaccine incorporated with the new
strain before the summer peak. Healthcare workers
again showed a low (31.8%) intention to accept.4
One may argue that, from these data on
flu vaccines, we cannot infer a low acceptance of
COVID-19 vaccines, because of the vast difference
in health and economic impact. However, our
repeated cross-sectional studies on the local working
population show that acceptance for COVID-19
vaccines has declined from 44.2% during the first
wave to 34.8% during the third wave of epidemic.5 Similarly low vaccine acceptance rates were revealed
by another study which included more elderly
participants, who are considered as the priority group
for vaccination.6 That study also identified specific
barriers for COVID-19 vaccines. For instance,
43.4% of participants expressed lack of confidence
on vaccines produced by new platforms, 52.2%
considered the track record of vaccine manufacturers
important, and 62.5% regarded the country of vaccine
production could affect their acceptance. These are
beyond the key safety and efficacy issues that policy
makers are focused on. It is notable that government
recommendation was the strongest driver for vaccine
acceptance, conferring a 10-times-higher odds of
receiving vaccines among the study participants.
One may optimistically assume that these
opinions on willingness or intention to accept
will change when the public are offered vaccines.
Unfortunately, despite a massive government-led
vaccination campaign, the uptake after 1 month of
availability was only about 6% of the total population
in Hong Kong. Had we underestimated the results
of pre-rolling out vaccine acceptance surveys? Had
we not proactively addressed vaccine hesitancy?
Although there are numerous public education and
promotion materials on COVID-19 vaccines being
disseminated to the public through various media,
combating vaccine hesitancy is another ball game.
If we do not develop an effective strategic plan to
counter vaccine hesitancy, we will be unable to
escape from the COVID-19 pandemic. Efforts to
develop and produce vaccines for COVID-19 at
unprecedented speed and scales may be in vain.
We believe vaccine hesitancy should be
addressed by an organised and concerted effort
contributed to by various stakeholders in the
community. This effort should include more
intensive education, provision of more evidencebased
information, and public health interventions
to enhance vaccine uptake.7 Exemption from travel
bans, issuance of vaccination certificates, visitation
rights at healthcare facilities, and incentives offered
by the commercial sector to the employees are some
potential strategies to increase the inoculation rate
further, and this requires collaborative initiatives
driven by healthcare policies.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the concept and design. PKS Chan drafted the manuscript. MCS Wong and ELY Wong critically
reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the
editorial, approved the final version for publication, and take
responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
Disclosures
PKS Chan is a member of the Expert Committee on Clinical
Events Assessment Following COVID-19 Immunisation
for the Hong Kong SAR Government. Other authors have
disclosed no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Streeck H, Schulte B, Kümmerer BM, et al. Infection
fatality rate of SARS-CoV2 in a super-spreading event in
Germany. Nat Commun 2020;11:5829. Crossref
2. World Health Organization. Ten threats to global health
in 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/
spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019. Accessed 31 Mar 2021.
3. Chor JS, Ngai KL, Goggins WB, et al. Willingness of
Hong Kong healthcare workers to accept pre-pandemic
influenza vaccination at different WHO alert levels: two
questionnaire surveys. BMJ 2009;339:b3391. Crossref
4. Wong MC, Nelson EA, Leung C, et al. Ad hoc influenza
vaccination during years of significant antigenic drift in a
tropical city with 2 seasonal peaks: a cross-sectional survey
among health care practitioners. Medicine (Baltimore)
2016;95:e3359. Crossref
5. Wang K, Wong EL, Ho KF, et al. Change of willingness to
accept COVID-19 vaccine and reasons of vaccine hesitancy
of working people at different waves of local epidemic
in Hong Kong, China: repeated cross-sectional surveys.
Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9:62. Crossref
6. Wong MC, Wong EL, Huang J, et al. Acceptance of the
COVID-19 vaccine based on the health belief model:
A population-based survey in Hong Kong. Vaccine
2021;39:1148-56. Crossref
7. Dror AA, Eisenbach N, Taiber S, et al. Vaccine hesitancy:
the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. Eur J
Epidemiol 2020;35:775-9. Crossref